Hello
I like to believe I put a lot of work into my planes and some end up being glazed over, and looking around I’ve noticed a lot of good builds are being glazed over.
If you have any old posts you feel have gone under-appreciated, share them here for everyone to have a second look at.
My groomer is very-very unappreciated. It is the only detailed groomer on simple planes.
Big Barb
Definitely, as it was my first upload in a while..
I’m not very popular, so I believe that I myself get glossed over by most people, which means my car boat thing hasn’t gotten the love it deserves. Please go check it out. I’m new and I’m trying to get enough points so that I can upvote other people’s builds. Check it out By copying this link and pasting it into the search bar
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/L4ZErZ/car-boat-thing-bug-fixes
I never once thought of that at all myself, thanks for mentioning, I often too that to some degree @F4f879
I can’t get the link but my Wolf class
this for sure
a whole 24 downloads
this one for sure. The fact it uses the smoke trails mod might have been a factor but it can be flown without the mod parts with no issue. It's also no fun if you haven't read at least a bit of the description and pulled a few Kulbits with it.
The Libélula was another one that surprised me a bit because it's just a huge joy to fly around. I can see why though honestly, it's pretty simple and has its issues, such as the scale being off.
I cannot really complain about anything though, because on the other hand, the large flying wing I posted just after the Garrucha, for instance, garnered a lot, but a lot more attention than I could ever have expected. I made that one when I was bored and frankly have no idea why it did so well.
this would be the only build I think that would qualify as “under appreciated”
for some people wondering why their super detailed/complex builds dont get lots of attention, sometimes people (myself included) get intimidated by the 100 page user manuals for the build. not to say these dont deserve attention, but i personally get turned off from things that are too complex
Anything counts lol @TheFantasticTyphoon
Does this count?
Maybe all of my creation is underrated, check my profile, you will only see forums more often than creation
rip
rip
extra rip
rip
rip
I think we're about done here
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/mo872R/Eiro-P10
lol
this chonker
Here
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/72215E/AY-73-Mercury-Multirole-Fighter-Jet
I can't figure out how to make clickable links so this is The best I've got.
Here lol
this simple plane
These kinds of posts are a lovely way to give back to a community. Although like others I could write a book about undeperforming (albeit the builds are often admittedly simple...hence the name of the game), I would like to get this out there.
A mate and I used our big brains together to figure out an automatic variabke-geometry wing sweep system using the new possibilities in 1.9. The plane itself is basic, yet for the amount of work that went into it I think it'd be cool for my mate as well if more get to see, use, evaluate and improve the mechanism.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/O1I5ze/EE-Point
this little guy
But i dont really care if they get attentionor not
BT-7274 Vanguard Class Titan
This thing i put alot of time to make
I honestly don't have any underappreciated builds. There are some that I thought were underappreciated but just recently I marked them as failures.
Sky Cruiser E-92, looks like something from 1.3.
E-92 SE, flies well but ugly as heck.
Petlyakov Pe-2, oversized flying brick.