Here
Its the article for simpleplanes
Refer to the wikipedian's manual of style for editing
And why?
You)re helping wikipedia by making the article more reliable
Here
Its the article for simpleplanes
Refer to the wikipedian's manual of style for editing
You)re helping wikipedia by making the article more reliable
Well did you edit any pages logged out? @AndrePlaysSP
Can definitely agree with the 2015 reviewers on how there's no tutorials for anything, especially true now with addition of Fine Tuner and Overload having absolutely no tutorial, and the only one actually in the game doesn't include fuselage pieces.
the mixed review is when the game first launched
Plus, in Wikipedia, your opinion should comply with the MoS of Wikipedia @DickBrazen
Welcome to Wikipedia, @DickBrazen. Lists like that are only supposed to be used in listing things like examples, not features. That should be in sentence form.
The last review says it's boring. Boring!? Um, hellooooo. This community is still going strong for over 5 years. We obviously haven't gotten bored of this game.
Put it in sentence form@DickBrazen
I added it so that others can edit stuff in @asteroidbook345
@Awsomur
For features put all the features of the game
The grammar on that page is about to be ruined.
@Plane66373637 idk what im doing... ill fix it
You're not supposed to make the article personal @ACEPILOT109
I added a SP review
ACEPILOT109 stop, you have to refer to the manual of style or else the admins will block you from editing for 12 months
Nice now someone needs to read the MoS (manual of style) and put the things in sentence form @asteroidbook345