Hello SimplePlanes community.
So I have finally gotten round to making this forum post, but here it is, the results to my Unusual General Aviation Challenge.
1st:
@Cardboard
Design: 7/10
Performance: 9.5/10
Paint scheme: 10/10
Build quality: 8/10
My impressions: 7/10
Description: 4/10
Total: 45.5/60
2nd:
@Omel
Design: 9/10
Performance: 7/10
Paint scheme: 8.5/10
Build quality: 10/10
My impressions: 8.5/10
Description: 6/10
Total: 49/60 - 4 = 45/60
3rd:
@Omel (3)
Design: 8/10
Performance: 5/10
Paint scheme: 7/10
Build quality: 8.5/10
My impressions: 7.5/10
Description: 8/10
Total: 44/60
4th:
@Wi1dSk7
Design: 7.5/10
Performance: 6/10
Paint scheme: 7.5/10
Build quality: 9/10
My impressions: 8/10
Description: 5/10
Total: 43/60
Joint-5th:
@Baldovino (2) & @Omel (2)
@Baldovino (2)
Design: 8/10
Performance: 7/10
Paint scheme: 4/10
Build quality: 7.5/10
My impressions: 8.5/10
Description: 7.5/10
@Omel (2)
Design: 8/10
Performance: 6/10
Paint scheme: 4.5/10
Build quality: 9/10
My impressions: 7/10
Description: 8/10
Total: 42.5/60 & 42.5/60
6th:
@Baldovino (3)
Design: 7.5/10
Performance: 6/10
Paint scheme: 5/10
Build quality: 7.5/10
My impressions: 6/10
Description: 7.5/10
Total: 39.5/60
7th:
@Baldovino
Design: 8.5/10
Performance: 4.5/10
Paint scheme: 3.5/10
Build quality: 6/10
My impressions: 7.5/10
Description: 8/10
Total: 38/60
8th:
@Jokowi
Design: 7/10
Performance: 6.5/10
Paint scheme: 7/5/10
Build quality: 5/10
My impressions: 5.5/10
Description: 4/10
The 3rd place rewards have gone to the User in 4th place (@WI1DSK7) as the 3rd place is @Omel's third entry, therefore it ould be unfair for them to get more upvotes than usual.
For anyone wondering, if your total score has a point reduction in it, it means it exceeded the size limit.
Thank you to those who entered this challenge.
It was a great pleasure to see all your entries.
@Baldovino
Your're very welcome :3
Great challenge, it was a pleasure to think out of the box to enter.
:)
Woo! Thanks for third place. I definitely agree with the 6/10 performance rating.
Congrats to those who won!
First, I've never seen one (I'll have a look to see if I can update that result). But looking at your entry's web page, the blueprint of the actual thing shows some difference, like a smaller propeller diameter. And EnternalDarkness points out the flaws in the wing design.
Two, pictures mainly take up the description. And it's not the most detailed one I've seen.
@Cardboard
Why did I get 4/10 on the description?
Why did I get 7/10 on design, its almost a perfect replica @ND40X
Eyy im not last
@Thueerra
@Baldovino
@Omel
@Cardboard
@TifftheCat
@SimpleJoe
@MrPorg137
@robloxweponco
@Garrett1235
@enzoBoeing757
@Tpierce
@Jerrrrrrrrry
@Wi1dSk7
@TheChosenOne
@Jokowi
@Riskitforabiscuit
@Vtp28
@Badplanesdotnet
@Numbers