Yeah. The shell ejection was probably an afterthought, or at least wasn’t brought up early in development. On the other hand, however, the crew probably ejects the shells in non-war environments to keep the cabin free of clutter and potentially poisonous gasses from the spent shells. Then in a war situation they keep them for concealment. I have no idea though @BaconAircraft
I wouldn’t say the best, but the lowest maintenance and most simplistic yet gets the job done. The T-62 is watertight and have filter systems capably of maintaining a clean cabin in biological warfare and fallout.... but it has to open a hatch to yeet a casing when shooting... which defeats the purpose of a clean compartment system. @CRJ900Pilot
No matter the situation, the Russian solutions are usually the memest. Used shells? Yeet them outside. Americans build million dollar space pen? Use a pencil. Americans build SST and space shuttle? Copy them. Lol @BaconAircraft
@CRJ900Pilot Well I mean some does.
There's 3 main ways shells are disposed of.
1. I dont give a damn, casing exits breach falls on floor or a bin
2. Russian YEET (T-62 to today) where spent casing gets yoten out of the turret
3. Rheinmetall casing-b-gone where the shell casing essentially evaporates in the breach during combustion of the propellent charge and nothing is left. (Leopard 2s and abrams, and to name a few)
Wow, very nice! I always thought takes kept their spent shells to hide where they’ve been. Anyway, the whole mechanism is very smooth and looks flawless
Hmm. Idk but the m1 abrams did this in a video I watched on the barrel bump thing. It’s funny cause I watched it yesterday day and I forgot everything already lol@BaconAircraft
@Jerba Nyet comrade. Modern stabilized tanks have negligible upward recoil due to presence of dampers and two-plane stabilisers. The T-62 requires the barrel to be returned to neutral position in order for the next shell to be loaded. For this example, when firing from an angle of elevation, the barrel goes down and returns to neutral elevation after firing for the loader to load, then raises to it's elevated position again. What you're talking about is recoil. This movement is a mechanical system at work.
@BobBobTheLandia same question.
Is it already released or...
CRJ900Pilot Stop fighting With him
Oh I did not know that lmao @BaconAircraft
Woah so realistic!
@CRJ900Pilot No can't do. Eject is automatic lmfao. Don't wanna eject? Dont fire! Lol
Yeah. The shell ejection was probably an afterthought, or at least wasn’t brought up early in development. On the other hand, however, the crew probably ejects the shells in non-war environments to keep the cabin free of clutter and potentially poisonous gasses from the spent shells. Then in a war situation they keep them for concealment. I have no idea though @BaconAircraft
I wouldn’t say the best, but the lowest maintenance and most simplistic yet gets the job done. The T-62 is watertight and have filter systems capably of maintaining a clean cabin in biological warfare and fallout.... but it has to open a hatch to yeet a casing when shooting... which defeats the purpose of a clean compartment system. @CRJ900Pilot
No matter the situation, the Russian solutions are usually the memest. Used shells? Yeet them outside. Americans build million dollar space pen? Use a pencil. Americans build SST and space shuttle? Copy them. Lol @BaconAircraft
@BaconAircraft do you have discord i need help with a tank
@BaconAircraft The russian yeet seems to be the best one for me XD
@CRJ900Pilot Well I mean some does.
There's 3 main ways shells are disposed of.
1. I dont give a damn, casing exits breach falls on floor or a bin
2. Russian YEET (T-62 to today) where spent casing gets yoten out of the turret
3. Rheinmetall casing-b-gone where the shell casing essentially evaporates in the breach during combustion of the propellent charge and nothing is left. (Leopard 2s and abrams, and to name a few)
Wow, very nice! I always thought takes kept their spent shells to hide where they’ve been. Anyway, the whole mechanism is very smooth and looks flawless
Nice invention! The spent cartridges are a bit too big for the tank.
When I first saw this I read:
Shall poop asparagus 9000.
Yes, I didn’t know cause that’s what he said in the video that I was watching cause I was bored. I didn’t even watch the whole thing.@SnoWFLakE0s
@Jerba
.
Are you talking about the fume extractor? That doesn't need elevation to do its job. A neutral loading position is demonstrated here.
@jamesPLANESii are u ok bud? how much crack did u snort
I up dooted it
HurrrrrrRRRRRRRRRAAAA
Ppppppppppppp
💩💦🌊
Ahhhhh....
WOAH!!
T H I C C
Hmm. Idk but the m1 abrams did this in a video I watched on the barrel bump thing. It’s funny cause I watched it yesterday day and I forgot everything already lol@BaconAircraft
Nice! Tag me!
@Jerba Nyet comrade. Modern stabilized tanks have negligible upward recoil due to presence of dampers and two-plane stabilisers. The T-62 requires the barrel to be returned to neutral position in order for the next shell to be loaded. For this example, when firing from an angle of elevation, the barrel goes down and returns to neutral elevation after firing for the loader to load, then raises to it's elevated position again. What you're talking about is recoil. This movement is a mechanical system at work.