Hey, community, so I was curious about this:
What is the input so that something only activates after >90% throttle?
I want to build a working afterburner that functions off of this rather than an Activation Group. Any and all help is appreciated!
Hey, community, so I was curious about this:
I want to build a working afterburner that functions off of this rather than an Activation Group. Any and all help is appreciated!
"0.9<Throttle<1" - Respectively for throttle from 90 to 100 percent
use the one on my t-38 it works for both afterburners and engine nozzle codes it will activate afterburner at 96% which is is more accurate so that each 1% is an afterburner ring (yes it works like this irl). For example, if I built an f-16 I would put it at 96% for mil power and each additional percent is one of the five rings of afterburner.
Do floor(Throttle). It will activate the afterburner at full throttle rather than at 90% so you can get that extra 9% in
Yes. Use Throttle > 0.9 for your input.
This is for 3 of my 4 upcoming builds lol. The Expeller will have weak afterburner, the Baby Hawk will have a really powerful afterburner, and likewise with the latter, the Super Hawk will have EXTREME POWAH for its afterburner.
The B-36J did not have afterburner though
@Damirruki thanks!
I’ve forgotten what it was, but it’s far more complicated than yours @spefyjerbf
@ChrisPy oh, okay! Thanks!
So on those make sure they activate at different throttle levels then. Ex:
99% activates first ring and 100% activates the second ring. Just use the code I had and replace .95 with .99@LieutenantSOT
@ChrisPy I'll look into it though. Thanks!
@ChrisPy oh, awesome! That actually is a great idea.
The Baby Hawk will likely have 2 rings of afterburner (it will have supercruise, as the jets are mostly meant for only mil power)
The Super hawk will have 2 F119s (each have 3 rings) and the special main engine on it will have 4 rings (2 inside each of the 4 small heat-suppression internal nozzles, and 2 in the main nozzle)
@asteroidbook345 thank you!
I think that one could work more realistically too
@Kangy I'm not sure what edensk uses. Can you paste the code?
@spefyjerbf That one is way simpler than the one that edensk uses, is there a major difference or is it simplified?
@spefyjerbf oh, that's literally the input? Lmao. Thank you so much!