@General360 has found a way to get rid of the need to add heaps of intakes. Simply put an engine in front where the airflow can enter it.
A good example is his plane
general360's Griffon
@General360 has found a way to get rid of the need to add heaps of intakes. Simply put an engine in front where the airflow can enter it.
A good example is his plane
general360's Griffon
Exactly so if you put 1 engine in the back. You would need intakes to get enough air. So by reasoning we can say that the first engine would be acting as a kind of air intake for the second. Eliminating the need for additional intakes to make the 2nd engine 'breathe' @Skua @TheLatentImage @General360
@dsr1aviation the engine that has an exposed intake seems to get enough air for both of them
Ok i will will kinda agree but 2 engines 1 gets intake. Where does the 2nd engine get its intake if it is concealed?@TheLatentImage
@General360 that engine exposed on the front actually will generate thrust as well, you can cover the exhausts entirely and it still works. I think the engines just have the ability to take in far more air than they actually use. The Griffon was an awesome build, by the way
@General360 yeah, but that still means that you have to have either an engine or one of the two air intakes exposed. I wish we had more options for intakes, that would help the dynamics of builds considerably.
Well, most of my current builds need intakes due to the location of the engine and etc.
@General360 this isn't really a fix though. It's been common knowledge (for me at least) that if the intakes on the engines are exposed then there isn't a need for additional intakes. Perhaps this will be useful info for some though.