Basically I'm copying ComradeKaiser7 now.
But I mean, why not?
7 on the Leaderboard:
X5B-2B by GorillaGuerrilla
Stability: 12/25
Just... Goddamn awful.
Design: 14/25
Original design, creative. Although the design is a bit uh... Wild, to say the least...
Level Of Detail: 10/25
There's little to no details, whatsoever. But considering my rules set at the time, and the design overall, it's understandable.
Performance: 8/25
Oh god, I do not wanna touch this thing again.
BONUS:
Cockpit: 6/10
It feels so... cramped... Everything from the buttons, the screens, and even the Hud... It feels like someone put too much Jet fuel on the Radar...
Weapons: ?/10
I don't even want to bother touching the weapon, no more.
Total: 50(?)/120 (44/100)
6 on the Leaderboard:
GiM-92-F3c by GorillaGuerrilla
Stability: 12/25
Same reason as above.
Design: 14/25
Same reason.
Level of Detail: 10/25
Same reason.
Performance: 9/25
Just barely better. But oh god the TVC is awful.
BONUS:
Cockpit: 6/10
Just literally copy-paste. Awful.
Weapons: 8/10
At least there's custom weapons. It just doesn't fit well with the Aircraft's design.
Total: 59/120 (45/100)
Stability:
5 on the Leaderboard:
Su-57 Felon by MABUR
Stability: 18/25
Eh, it's good enough. A little lacking for it to be very good, but good enough.
Design: 20/25
A good replica. Although, please tune down the size next time. And maybe add those ailerons while you're into it.
Level of Detail: 18/25
Not alot of details, but some tiny details are quite nice. Like the TVC.
Performance: 15/25
Uh... I spun too much... How many Gs did I pull...? Oh, wait did I broke some parts too? Oh crap, sorry about that!
BONUS:
Weapons: 7/10
Base Weapons, but it's there. Kinda sad that it doesn't have the bay door. And guns just sometimes destroy yourself...
Total: 63/110 (56/100)
4 on the Leaderboard:
Su-35 Flanker by MABUR
Stability: 20/25
It flies pretty well when TVC is disabled.
Design: 19/25
Other than missing control surfaces, it's pretty cool.
Level of Detail: 18/25
Like the Su-57, there's not alot of details. But I like the tiny details.
Performance: 20/25
Other than manual "countersteer", it PSMs pretty smoothly. Just, don't pull on the stick too long.
Total: 77/100
3 on the Leaderboard:
Su-33 Flanker-D by KanKalashnikov
Stability: 22/25
It flies very well, wow!
Design: 23/25
A very cool replica! It's amazing.
Level of Details: 15/25
There's good amounts of details. But all those details make the Performance Cost become above 2700. So I'll have to reduce your point on this one. Sorry chief!
Performance: 20/25
A TVC? on a Su-33? That's illegal!
And I love it. It has the auto counter steer thing as well, I like it!
BONUS:
Weapons: 9/10
Custom weapons! :O
There's even custom models too! Highly approved.
Although, I recommend moving them out, since it increases the Performance Cost.
Total: 89/110 (80/100)
2 on the Leaderboard:
SU-30MKM by GriseoCattus
Stability: 18/25
A little funky. But it works.
Design: 23/25
Solid replica. Some innacuracies here and there, but it's solid.
Level of Detail: 18/25
Not alot, but it's solid. I especially liked the warning near the gun.
Performance: 24/25
This guy has learned a lot from GuyFolk, this plane almost feels as good as GuyFolk's.
BONUS:
Weapons: 8/10
Custom weapons, would you look at that! Though the size is a little lacking. And the amounts of armaments is also lacking.
Total: 91/110(83/100)
1 on the Leaderboard:
SU-30MKM VR by GriseoCattus
Stability: 16/25
Lacking, let's just be honest.
Design: 23/25
Not alot has changed. I have nothing better to say.
Level of Detail: 22/25
Ok, wow. that's beautiful. You got lil' malaysian flag on the vertical stabilizers!
Performance: 23/25
Definitely a bit harder to master.
BONUS:
Cockpit: 9/10
Beautiful. Simple. Throttle stick is sideways but it's fine
Weapons: 9/10
Custom weapons, size is a little lacking, but...!
There's v a r i a t i o n s
Total: 102/120 (84/100)
That's all, I doubt this challenge will have 12 contestants until 27th of Feb. I'll modt likely change it to 27th of March.
If you're interested in participating, click here!
I forgot to test the Su-33 on the Carrier... Whoops!
@GorillaGuerrilla
and?
better not have both than having a huge ass clock.
@ZeroWithSlashedO a decent digital map is gonna drive the performance cost up by 700 sir.
@GorillaGuerrilla
1:
I did not mean about civilian techniques.
2:
Even if I did, no one's going to fucking do it, it's not useful in any situations whatsoever.
3:
What? You think digital maps are not a thing?
4:
When I said about the arguments in my previous comment, I mean it in the military. Imagine dogfighting without looking around. You need to say goodbye to this world if you want to do it.
u are right when u said no one have ever seen such a big thing on the dash on planes. but if u know how to use it this is one of the only things u will ever need to stay in the air, of course unless a mountain says otherwise, this is one of the most useful instruments literally i make sure i can see it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsxItW_6NlE
if u can fly only by looking outside.
"thats suicide." - cloud & fog
(real fun starts at 14:00)
@ZeroWithSlashedO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu_MN-kUsD8
watch this pilot trainee flying "blindfolded" starting at 13:50.
well, flying without looking around is an actual flying skill. theres an actual curriculum, it's an actual thing that saves people from the top deadly plane crash scenario. actually flying without looking outside is what top pilot in real life learn how to do before the weather says otherwise. if u know how to fly real planes especially a commercial one you will know how little looking outside really means to flying. look up instrument flight rule to learn more. when u fly real plane u actually have lots of time looking outside is the same as looking at a wall
@GorillaGuerrilla
Yeah... I think you need to see a doctor...
Flying without looking around is like suicide. No joke.
so what? That reduces your awareness by a fuck ton. You ever see a plane use that big fucking clock on the dashboard? I doubt so.
@GriseoCattus do u mean ComradeKaiser7? he would have been a much happier man with my planes after he sees the difference between my x5b-2b and x5f... seriously. x5b-2b wasnt even funky treed. i am only 1 months into this simpleplane thing and already made like 20 new plane designs. i dont have a life anymore lol
@ZeroWithSlashedO it's funny how people complains about my instruments tho. but i think its ok 99.9% of the people here dont fly real planes and even 99% of real pilots are not good with IFR and dont know how to use the ROC meter. they just dont know how important that big clock thing on the right does. i can eat my whole dinner flying these planes without looking outside the window or crash or both just by looking at that. 99% of the people will die doing what i do, flying without looking outside. this is REAL piloting skill. look up IFR on youtube or internet. i only wish i can implement a better looking ILS to improve realism. then I can do a thick fog landing (yes 20 feet visibility) on carrier. its funny when people complained about the handling of the earlier versions of my plane when i can land them all on carrier. but then i agree i find it difficult to do too on a phone. i had done my earlier testing using a flight stick... now i have to buy 2 copies of sp... smhlol
@GriseoCattus
they cannot make the judgement call
The unenlightened masses
@GorillaGuerrilla
yah
this one's in the meantime.
see what my thoughts are about the aircraft, and maybe you can improve it.
@ZeroWithSlashedO but u said only the final product counts? the old planes are quite a bit different from the very first day i submitted, big changes, u are gonna test all again after the real deadline right? i think all planes have only been coded/funky treed after he tested. codings are the last thing i do. i make agile airframes (sometimes uncontrollable) first, then put fly by wire in at the end, i believe all the planes he tested were not funky treed yet.
flaker chalenge