1st place: Zerø with his F-A/18 Hornet, with a total score of 26/30!
2nd place: The AF-11 Albatross by Timplanes246, with 25/30!
3rd place: The FTA-31 by BigDoot, with 22/30!
La Vent:
Looks: 9/10 I like the little tidbits you added like nose art and no step signs on the wings and nose.
Performance: 4/10 It is sluggish and it is not easy to evade MG fire from the destroyers because of that. It is very heavily armed and very effective, but the sluggish controls are a drawback.
Realism: 5/5. This is a good attack aircraft, so i would see it in use.
Ease of use: 4/5 It is very easy to use and control.
Total Score: 22/30
Falcon Fighter:
Looks: 6/10 The blocky exterior is not my thing, but the coloration is nice.
Performance: 5/10 The load out is all around kind of underpowered, the cannons are the main weapon on this. The
Bombs are underpowered. I had trouble with the infernos because they could not take the destroyers out.
Realism: 3/5 It could be used by another country, but the load out is too thin.
Ease of use: 4/5 It is easy to use, fast and easy to handle.
Total score: 18/30
FTA-31:
Looks: 7/10 The outside is smooth. It looks nice.
Performance: 7/10 The cannon is great, it easily cut through the beast. The flares need to be beefed up though, because once they ran dry i was done for.
Realism: 4/5 It could be used by another country.
Ease of use: 4/5 It is easy to use, the cannon is amazing.
Total Score: 22/30
2T22:
Looks: 5/10 The silver body is nice, but i can see some visible overlaps, and the gear is misaligned on the tail.
Performance: 2/10 The aircraft is nigh on impossible to control due to the sensitivity of the ailerons. The missiles were one hit kills on the Beast’s destroyer escorts, but the machine gun is useless due to the sensitivity.
Realism: 4/5 The aircraft looks heavily like a mig 21 and if it were introduced into service it would be a moderate success.
Ease of use: 1/5 The aircraft’s lopsided gear arrangement makes it hard to take off and the roll sensitivity makes it very hard to control.
Total Score: 12/30
T-167:
Looks: 8/10 I like the cockpit, the polished blue paint job is the cherry on top.
Performance: 4/10 It is slow, sluggish, and underarmed. Needs better flares and more powerful missiles.
Realism: 4/5 Looks like something from the 60’s and i can see it in service.
Ease of use: 3/5 Outside of combat it flies pretty nice, but in combat it is hard to use.
Total Score: 19/30
A-31C:
Looks: 5/10 I like the look, but some of the design choices are questionable.
Performance: 4/10 It is alright, but the sluggish turning combined with the lack of flares and non-modified missiles are a major setback.
Realism: 3/5 I can see this in service with a nation like Britain or Germany.
Ease of use: 2/5 Takeoff is difficult close to V1 speeds because of an imbalance that makes it veer hard to the right.
Total Score: 14/30
F/A-18:
Looks: 8/10 The only thing holding this back from a perfect score is the cockpit, it looks kind of chunky for lack of a better term.
Performance: 9/10 The Mixed air to air and air to ground armament make it useful in a variety of situations. The flares and realistic weapon count are the cherry on top.
Realism: 5/5 I could see this in use with Maysia.
Ease of use: 4/5 It is a bit slow, but that is sticking with reality, and the weapon count is nice as well.
Total Score: 26/30
A-10
Looks: 6/10 The Exterior looks nice, but it needs more detail.
Performance: 3/10 The sluggish controls, thin armament, lack of flares, and no cockpit view make this very difficult to use for its role.
Realism: 3/5 I could see this in service.
Ease of use: 2/5 The controls are very sluggish and it is difficult to fly.
Total Score: 14/30
AF-11
Looks: 10/10 The exterior is so smooth, and this is the only plane in the challenge with a Bona Fide cockpit. Great work!
Performance: 6/10 With only 3 bombs, 16 flares, and 6 infernos, this aircraft needs some more armament. It flies well, however.
Realism: 5/5 It could very likely be put in use by another country.
Ease of Use: 4/5 It flies great, but it is set back by its armament.
Total Score: 25/30
@Almost 😑
@TheDesignate you weren’t first, the top says the winners, you were the first runner up.
i didn’t rank runners up because i’m lazy, it’s just how it turned out
@Almost i was 1st in the challenge how?
@Luckykai74
@AnHNWhiteCornet
@TheAviationBoy
@TheDesignate
@DajeTuning
@HighMike
@Korzalerke i spaced it out.
@Korzalerke ok.
You can't tag more than 3 people at once, they don't get notified. Also try improving the formatting a bit, this is really hard to read.
@ZeroWithSlashedO i get you, just didn’t notice them before this.
@Almost
1. Already did, check my Eurofighter. And the F-16C is in the making.
2. These low-part builds are just a side project.
3. The high part and larger size builds take a long time, 1-2 months at best.
@ZeroWithSlashedO Maybe you should make a larger build.
@Almost
I know, but it was a part of the low-part builds like my MiG-29.
@ZeroWithSlashedO trust me, part counts is not an issue for me.
ayy :)
one reason why I didn't make the cockpit prettier was to make the part counts lower.
1st: @ZeroWithSlashedO
2nd: @Timplanes246
3rd: @Bigdoot
Runners Up:
@TheDesignate
@DajeTuning
@HighMike
@Luckykai74
@AnHNWhiteCornet
@TheAviationBoy