Personal thought
Compared with SimplePlanes, SR2 is much much harder than i think...
That's why i am more rely on SimplePlanes rather than SR2. It even lack of parts and also complicated tuning.
Played it on mobile, but not for a long time. Just for trial purpose.
Guess i'm playing SR2 just for temporal time, i am more on SimplePlanes instead.
@Bellcat well one of you skill sets is as a reacher or muse cus this was highly enlightening, I hadn’t even thought about the grid icon I saw many times, then to know that a old school builder finds them that much of a highlight then it’s all the more hilighted in my tiplist, ty sir!
@WolfHunter9111 i check it 2 months ago, is f@#**King
It's more difficult, but it has more to explore and do
@Bellcat you were right
I keep fat fingering the cursor in SR2 mobile, I try to move a part and get left with a mess of duplicated fuselages (ik they're called fuel tanks in SR2 but let's be honest here, they're fuselages)
People have different skillsets. I am able to use SimpleRockets2 to almost full extent on mobile (but not on computer), hence why I deem it easy. One of my most favorite things is how the editor works, especially the ability to move and rotate parts in a grid-like pattern like a 3D creation software; the pattern can be modified as well. If you can’t do Simplerockets2, that’s okay but if you really want to make creation in Simplerockets2 easier, then you have to train yourselves.
.
I also usually try to replicate mechanisms in Simplerockets2 (e.g. continuous track suspension systems from different eras).
@WolfHunter9111 Yes, I struggle with the details.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE It can be, but I’ve figured it out.
@BeastHunter also the navigation is super hard
@BeastHunter yeah i had to admit it. Even the tunings are more complicated
SR2 is more difficult, but lots of fun.