@HololiveFan
What's your point?
They're two different aircraft, the top one still bears those extra livery details, the other one just doesn't.
But both are in the same base livery, which is the Airbus house livery for the Neo line.
AND, the first one just has image details in the 'Neo' on the tail fin. For example, if you look at the top of the 'N' on the right side, you'll see the Elizabeth Tower (or Big Ben as you'll probably know it).
The 2nd livery (F-WWAB) was actually means that the origin and the destination was gone for some reason because they want to make the blue darker and the word "neo" was white instead of blue. Also, the word "XLR" was missing even you can just see the words "A321XLR" on the left winglet
Guys, lemme know in the comments until I will know how airbus did this!
@FeatherWing i see
@HololiveFan
What's your point?
They're two different aircraft, the top one still bears those extra livery details, the other one just doesn't.
But both are in the same base livery, which is the Airbus house livery for the Neo line.
AND, the first one just has image details in the 'Neo' on the tail fin. For example, if you look at the top of the 'N' on the right side, you'll see the Elizabeth Tower (or Big Ben as you'll probably know it).
@FeatherWing just look at the pics!
@HololiveFan
Sorry...what?
The 2nd livery (F-WWAB) was actually means that the origin and the destination was gone for some reason because they want to make the blue darker and the word "neo" was white instead of blue. Also, the word "XLR" was missing even you can just see the words "A321XLR" on the left winglet
I belive its called "Painting"
I'm not sure but I think they used something called painting.
@Bo1233 whaaaaaaa???????
they used ms paint
They just painted it...
They just.. did