Profile image

New feature ideas!

1,278 FUGGA  1.7 years ago
  1. Anchored blueprint [Best]
    it is very annoying when you accidentally pan it

  2. Adjustable fuselage poly [Best]
    it will be very useful if you want to make the wings look sharper and less rounded and also be able to make a low poly style plane without using too many fuselage this will make most buids even more mobile friendly

  3. New all directional fuselage [maybe]
    it will contain upper left,up(middle),upper right,lower left,down(middle),lower right. instead of just backwards and forwards.

  4. A.i assisted wing shape imitator using blueprint(only for wing panels)
    traces the blueprint

  5. [removed]

  6. Realistic drag calculation [maybe pls]

  7. Realistic customizable wing presets [PLS]
    has options to add slats and control surfaces

  8. Buit in textures [PLS]
    for your planes so you dont have to make them yourself

  9. [removed]

  10. [removed]

i have more ideas but i forgot some of them

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    137k BaconEggs

    skill issue

    +2 1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    1. Being able to lock into one of the orthographic views would be really really nice when working with blueprints, yeah (I'd imagine particularly so for mobile users).
    2. Uhh... not sure what you're getting at here other than possibly procedural shaped wings?
    3. If I understand you correctly, you can already do this with a bit of cutting and a few extra fuselage blocks.
    4. Yeah, that's not going to happen.
    5. Already possible if you just delete anything you don't want (e.g. internal parts) and then export it as a 3d model. You just have to do it manually.
    6. Improvements to the drag calculations would be fairly nice, but could affect existing builds (and honestly the drag calculations aren't really that bad to begin with either).
    7. Again, more advanced shaped procedural wings. Would be nice to see but I don't know if they're even on the list of possibilities.
    8. There's a mod for that.. But I don't see it ever officially being added for a variety of reasons.
    9. Uh... no thanks. That would almost certainly cause more problems than it would solve, and leveling one part with another is already incredibly easy to do since you can just input position values manually.
    10. Yeah, that's never gonna happen. Not a chance.
    +3 1.7 years ago