Profile image

Plane Builders: Do you prefer Arcade or Sim and why?

12.7k JuanShot2Go  1.5 years ago

So many fabulous creations by the community. I've noticed that some builders lovingly recreate the complicated startup sequences and operation of a plane while others, like me build more arcade style controls. Also, people are very purist when it comes to their own individual approach. What type of control schemes do you build and why does it feel more fun for you than doing it the other way?

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    8,997 hardy57

    I am a first person guy. I like to build cockpits with functional gauges and controls and also some form of different auto pilot systems. A few of my creations even have a first person walker. I am not so much into replicas but try to give my fictional creations realistic or at leas plausible flight, driving or diving characteristics.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    So, cockpit layouts?

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    76.9k MrCOPTY

    Sim, Cuz I'm Simmer/Sim Builder

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    37.2k V

    Yaw for steering and pitch for forward/reverse in non-vr cars, for vr, a fighter throttle with a reverse switch

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.4k Kangy

    when I make a plane fly realistically and it adds realism to it

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    I like making my builds like a simulator since it adds some realism to it

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.4k Kangy

    Sim. Arcade just feels gross and boring.
    Here’s my reasoning
    What is ace combat known for? Lore and enticing fast paced gameplay
    What are flight simulators like DCS or IL2 known for? Life like realism, slow paced but rewarding gameplay
    With this in mind I don’t have a zoomer brain so there’s that I guess

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @32 Literally the reason I haven't uploaded anything in a year 😅

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Simulation

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    162k spefyjerbf

    Arcade, because I suck at flying. Besides, it gives me an opportunity to apply some funny math to SP

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    76.6k 2Papi2Chulo

    @32 I've already spent two days on one functional display screen. I used calc to get equations for engine parameters and may too much code.

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    definitely the older, arcady ones. these newer creations that require you to start up procedure your own goddamn body make my singular brain cell hurt and its just painful when i find a craft that looks and flies amazing but needs you to do a freaking calculus lesson just to get it to move

    as for my own stuff, ill do arcade style ofc but if i have the time to do so i'll leave in a simple interior with basic controls and switches (nothing special)

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.6k 32

    @2Papi2Chulo hey I won't stop you, but your family may wonder why they haven't seen you in 5 years.

    +3 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    76.6k 2Papi2Chulo

    @32 sounds like a challenge to make one perfect

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.6k 32

    Here's my thoughts: You can never make a perfect plane. SimplePlanes will never allow you to get 100% accuracy on your builds. You can get like 95%, but that takes thousands of parts and still isn't quite perfect. With that in mind, I would rather see planes that are fun to fly or are useful. Helicopters that can lift things, A-10s with ridiculous amounts of ordinance, or cars that are completely fictional but drive like a dream. To be honest, the experience trumps realism for me. If it looks perfect, that's a bonus.

    +10 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.7k Bryan5

    I personally prefer Sim.

    1.5 years ago