@DatTrainGuy19 oh alr

@AtlasAir747MyBeloved i wasn't even trying to target you this time, it was supposed to be a joke poking fun at cyberpunk-

@DatTrainGuy19 more like cyberUrMom 2069

@JuliaAircraft idk

cg error

@AtlasAir747MyBeloved cybermonke 2077

@DatTrainGuy19 alr

@AtlasAir747MyBeloved honestly, im more of a train guy myself so... just wait for the official report?

@AtlasAir747MyBeloved you tagged yourself...

@AtlasAir747MyBeloved well what do u think about the cause of the 2024 haneda airport runway collision?

@AtlasAir747MyBeloved i swear i remember you commenting something angry towards me, i just don't know what it was.

@DatTrainGuy19 alr. Btw, sry for blocking u by accident

You know, if you actually changed for the better, we won't mind you doing stuff, as long as it isn't weird.

@HuskyDynamics01 correction: JTSB

@HuskyDynamics01
Yes, generally. But this does still sound link a time when more precise information would be useful. And yes, the sources that it sites are sometimes very useful.

@ColonelRelford If only the airlines and the FAA still saw it this way... Now it's all about how many boxes they can check off to hit the DEI numbers, not about the competency and experience of their flight crews.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: The physical laws of aviation do not care about the race, gender identity, skin tone, or any other social "qualifiers" the flight crew may have. Aviation is the one field where skill and experience should be prioritized over all else, and it pains me that somehow this has been cast aside in order for airlines to fill more DEI checkboxes for better press.

@Mousewithamachinegun123

Despite what your English teachers may tell you (it's okay, mine did too), Wikipedia is a decent source for getting basic information about a topic. It's not good to use for more in-depth research, and it's not a good source to cite (though the sources it cites could well be of use), but it's still a very good resource for general information.

The NTSB takes a long time to finalize their reports, because those reports will then be cited as the official cause of the accident any time it is brought up in the future (so it's pretty important they make sure they get it 100% right).

You do realize that it takes several months for a preliminary report to be written up and even longer for a final report to be published, right?

Do you really think Wikipedia is a good source to be using?

I think it's the Q300...

@XAircraftManufacturer oh nyo

@AtlasAir747MyBeloved I think the Q400, because ATC instructed them to hold short if the runway, and never instructed them to get onto the runway