@FlirBlitz
Affirmative!

So it begins. Again

@TheUltimatePlaneLover
I agree

@TheUltimatePlaneLover thank you

@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Both of those are fair statements, TUPL approves

@TheUltimatePlaneLover @CrestelAeronautics also the F-33F is going to be like the f-16 of Ac-industries

@TheUltimatePlaneLover I would say that in terms of air power yes I’m stronger than the Monarchii but anything else I would get cooked

@CrestelAeronautics That makes sense then

*edit
.
The SK-3 is more of a heavy fighter, like, air superiority (payload) instead of dogfighting. (Manuverability) The SN-4 is made for dogfighting, but can’t carry as much payload.
.
Sorry for my rant. The point still stands.

@CrestelAeronautics Well that's fair enough, then. At the same time, it still would make sense that dedicated fighter craft should have at least slightly stronger air-to-air performance than multirole aircraft. I wonder if there was an air-to-air dedicated mod of the SK-3?

@TheUltimatePlaneLover
The SK-3 is a multirole aircraft. There is the SK-3R which is made for ground attack, but still; the SK-3 base model, is a multirole.

Add another thought, I could be and probably am wrong, but I believe the SK-3 is a ground attack aircraft. As you said yourself (earlier), there haven't been many ground engagements in the Crestan Conflict, so it would make sense the SK-3 doesn't get to shine as much as it did back in the M-War when there was a colossal plethora of surface targets between the navy and army. More importantly, however, without many ground targets on either side, it makes sense that everyone is pitching for the best air superiority fighters they can get, as opposed to the M-War when many aircraft were multirole or ground attack. For example, out of the aircraft I contributed to the MGLA/MDA during the Monarchii War, the only full fighters or at least fighter-bombers were the PF-19 (FB), Intimidator, Vector, Twin Boom Me 262 and Micro Schwalbe, Super Hydra Mk. IV, F-11X Draconian (which was used much less than the F-11Y3 FiGrAA), SPEAR F-16, F-67 Doombringer and Extinctor, Su-78 SUMA, F-86 From Ohio (FB), XF-60 Tailflak (never saw combat), and the F-91X Hunterplane II. It's a large number at first until you consider the number of aircraft I actually contributed, like the legendary A-40B or F/A-32A.

Aight I'm done with my rant lol
I just love analyzing/summarizing combat performances

Hmmmm…
Do the AC Forces have more power than Monarchii? Possibly… not. Yes, airpower is my strong suit, so I’d hope the Falchion would be effective against any aircraft, especially older ones like the Intimdators and SK-3 from the M-War. However, although we probably still win the air game against the Monarchii, the issue comes when we consider their navy, AA weapons, and allies. Although their ground-to-ground and air-to-air performance were sub-par and decent respectively, their surface-to-air, be it naval or land, were quite menacing. Furthermore, Monarchii’s allies like LunarEclipse and Speedhunter brought absolute juggernauts to the table, most of which actually survived the war. AC probably is stronger than Monarchii the sole person’s Air Force, but the entire Monarchii Allies with all three branches, Monarchii probably wins mid diff.

@LoganTheGameDev
@WisconsinStatePolice
@TheNewSPplayer

@windshifter1
@Monarchii
@Speedhunter

@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@TheMouse
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26