Horrible
Based on the T72/T80 and sucks horrible turret ring armor (shown by that Bradley) and turret goes sky high due to the horrible location of the ammo
It's only famous because of warthunder making it OP yes it's Russia's best MBT but still struggles against the M1A1s gun and the Leo's armor
@GuardianAerospace I would recommend US air in F-15, A-7, and F-16
All have easy to master play styles just look up tutorials (I'm only in early game warthunder at Rank II but I'm going off larger warthunder YouTubers)
@STEAMYcrosby I didn’t know that it was a Russian company with that much bias, guess the “Russian bias” myth isn’t really a myth anymore. Gotta switch my tech tree soon lmao
@GuardianAerospace the only reason Russian tanks are so loved by tank communities is because Russian companies like Gajin and War gamming give Russia OP armor, guns, and speed on every tank which deludes people's minds
@GuardianAerospace in addition Russian troops could use it better but Russia is just too cheap to give them the proper training to give them a chance on the battlefield
If you were to talk statistics even the T-34, which was hated by Russian crews due to how hard it was to control and some parts would shatter on impact with 75mm and above shells from many tanks, was infinitely better for the time it was built then the T-90M same with the T-44, T-54 and T-55 all were better in terms of effectiveness for their time then the T-90M
T-34s dominated the Eastern front and most of early Korea untill Pershings
T-44 we're better T-34s
T-54s and T-55s we're feared by Patton crews due to their 100mm Guns and high pen.
T-54/55 is still somewhat effective today, it's still used by the Egyptians in the tank known as the Ramses the second, which is a heavily modernized T-54 and is still very effective in terms of technology, the Ramses uses tech from many countries.
Yeah sure T-44s we're not used and we're cramped but the were lighter and faster than the T-34/85 and paved the way for many more MBTs like the T-54s which was Russia's best MBT and scared NATO
@STEAMYcrosby anyone in a tank models T62 — T90 gets a very brief career in the Russian Air Force when they get shot at. Just a “safety mechanism” to ensure the crew is away from the blast zone ;)
@Graingy a picture of the fading emoji, there was an unusual ad on postimages.org, the image hosting I was using. Turns out some other people here got that ad as well. I will not say more
@Graingy the t90m is vastly “stronger” with thicker armor on different areas, a much bigger cannon, “better” sensors and moving parts and whatever. the Bradley is a lightly armored and armed tracked vehicle for support and infantry movement. the fact the t90m lost that bad is impressive itself
If I'm being honest, I think it's kinda cool. I also like the dazzlers a lot, used them quite frequently on my tanks during the Monarchii War (namely the M49A3/4, Le Tonk, and even the LAGWING Supercarrier later on)
Now you're just being petty.
A tank is a tank. The incompetence and corruption of its manufacturer does not discount the fact it is a 40 tonne tracked monster with a big gun, even if horribly short of the 50-60 tonne monsters of the "western" countries.
Horrible
Based on the T72/T80 and sucks horrible turret ring armor (shown by that Bradley) and turret goes sky high due to the horrible location of the ammo
It's only famous because of warthunder making it OP yes it's Russia's best MBT but still struggles against the M1A1s gun and the Leo's armor
@GuardianAerospace I would recommend US air in F-15, A-7, and F-16
All have easy to master play styles just look up tutorials (I'm only in early game warthunder at Rank II but I'm going off larger warthunder YouTubers)
@STEAMYcrosby I didn’t know that it was a Russian company with that much bias, guess the “Russian bias” myth isn’t really a myth anymore. Gotta switch my tech tree soon lmao
@GuardianAerospace the only reason Russian tanks are so loved by tank communities is because Russian companies like Gajin and War gamming give Russia OP armor, guns, and speed on every tank which deludes people's minds
@GuardianAerospace in addition Russian troops could use it better but Russia is just too cheap to give them the proper training to give them a chance on the battlefield
If you were to talk statistics even the T-34, which was hated by Russian crews due to how hard it was to control and some parts would shatter on impact with 75mm and above shells from many tanks, was infinitely better for the time it was built then the T-90M same with the T-44, T-54 and T-55 all were better in terms of effectiveness for their time then the T-90M
T-34s dominated the Eastern front and most of early Korea untill Pershings
T-44 we're better T-34s
T-54s and T-55s we're feared by Patton crews due to their 100mm Guns and high pen.
T-54/55 is still somewhat effective today, it's still used by the Egyptians in the tank known as the Ramses the second, which is a heavily modernized T-54 and is still very effective in terms of technology, the Ramses uses tech from many countries.
Yeah sure T-44s we're not used and we're cramped but the were lighter and faster than the T-34/85 and paved the way for many more MBTs like the T-54s which was Russia's best MBT and scared NATO
@GuardianAerospace true
@STEAMYcrosby anyone in a tank models T62 — T90 gets a very brief career in the Russian Air Force when they get shot at. Just a “safety mechanism” to ensure the crew is away from the blast zone ;)
@STEAMYcrosby finally! Someone who actually has a brain! You get pin
@Graingy @TheMouse got it a couple months ago
@Graingy a picture of the fading emoji, there was an unusual ad on postimages.org, the image hosting I was using. Turns out some other people here got that ad as well. I will not say more
ur post
image hosting service is gone
What were you trying to send?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover @Graingy nvm then
@GuardianAerospace I have no idea what you're saying right now.
@GuardianAerospace huh??
@Graingy @TheUltimatePlaneLover looks like i need to find a different image hosting service. why tf do they show ads like that?
@Graingy @TheUltimatePlaneLover wait wtf just happened i put the fading emoji 💀
@GuardianAerospace Definitely. I'm not sure what happened there, really.
@GuardianAerospace ?????
@Graingy the t90m is vastly “stronger” with thicker armor on different areas, a much bigger cannon, “better” sensors and moving parts and whatever. the Bradley is a lightly armored and armed tracked vehicle for support and infantry movement. the fact the t90m lost that bad is impressive itself
If I'm being honest, I think it's kinda cool. I also like the dazzlers a lot, used them quite frequently on my tanks during the Monarchii War (namely the M49A3/4, Le Tonk, and even the LAGWING Supercarrier later on)
It is a 50 year old platform.
The details of that engagement are not something I've researched, but wasn't/weren't that/those tank(s) basically alone?
@Graingy nor does it discount the fact it cant compete with a 40 year old platform for a infantry fighting vehicle…
Now you're just being petty.
A tank is a tank. The incompetence and corruption of its manufacturer does not discount the fact it is a 40 tonne tracked monster with a big gun, even if horribly short of the 50-60 tonne monsters of the "western" countries.