Profile image

What is the limit for a plane to still be simple?

19.9k VDBVitto191  1.2 years ago

In 2 whole years on the website and game, this question has always come to my mind:

"Why do people try to do complex and difficult things in a simple game?"

I honestly don't know the answer, as I have always valued fun above realism in SimplePlanes, since let's be honest... The objects we use to build in the game are Cylinders and square wings (lol XD). Why do some people want so much realism in SimplePlanes? Like, if I wanted realism, wouldn't an aerial simulator game be better, like MSFS 2020, DCS or IL-2?

Ps: I don't want to offend anyone, nor your tastes, I just want your opinion, with respect obviously.

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    19.9k VDBVitto191

    In my opinion, the limit is just being fun to fly. It doesn't matter if it has 5 pieces or 900.

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Part maximums
    150 parts (single engine prop)
    200 parts (dual engine prop, single engine jet)
    250 parts (dual engine jet, 3+ engine prop, dual engine if wwII bomber
    300-400 parts ( 3+ engine jet)
    Vr compatible cockpit but not too complex. Players are figuring out how to incorporate complex start, landing aids and auto pilot. None of theses are needed. engine start should be by switch or button, not auto.
    If combat aircraft a weapon safety should be included for multiplayer)
    Wings should be defined, but not too detailed. The stock planes are a great example of this.

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.6k X99STRIKER

    It's fun to go above and beyond, to test and push our skills.

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Vitto191 Based
    from PEAs to full-scale replicas, I care about having fun

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,281 Subsere

    @PlaneFlightX You’ve spent the last three years proving yourself to an amorphous collective of alleged individuals for a glimpse of pride lasting only as long as the middle comment.
    Respect.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,281 Subsere

    @SamTheUncle That’s a rather good point. Technique is important.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    37.0k Icey21

    Similar to what James said
    Why paint a single streak on a canvas and display it as a masterpiece when you can make a real masterpiece and display it as a masterpiece on a fundamentally simple sheet of canvas.
    Besides, MSFS, DCS, etc. don't allow you to fully unleash your creativity prowess like simpleplanes does.

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Why do people try to create masterpieces when they could paint really simple things in art?

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    62.2k PlaneFlightX

    As someone who's spent the last 3 years making the most detailed plane in the entire game, I just like building. I don't play flight simulators because I want to build the plane myself, and I don't just make planes for flight simulators because I'm quite good at SimplePlanes.

    +5 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    86.9k Zerkk

    I don't care about part count, as I see it's good looking, me upvote, me download (if it's mobile friendly though)

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    31.1k YarisSedan

    @Vitto191 holy moly your pfp scared the hell out of me

    +1 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.1k TheMouse

    Simple has very little to do with part count. I could post a 1000 part cube, made of tiny blocks, and that would definitely not be “complicated”
    Simple has much more to do with how the plane is built.

    +2 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    257k MAPA

    In my opinion: 600 Parts

    1.2 years ago