Profile image

[TFMR] We need more funding (MDA line)*

4,069 JSTQ  one month ago

Why is there an *? This represents that the event belongs to a series of events and will change direction with the current situation.

… So what do you mean
The army believes that in order to become stronger, they need new artillery and self-propelled air defense vehicles;
The Air Force believes that in order to become stronger, they need new air defense and missiles;
The navy believes that in order to become stronger, they need new ships and aircraft;
The Rocket Force believes that in order to become stronger, they need new cruise missiles and ballistic missiles;
The armed police think... forget it, they're not important.
…After all, do they think that giving money can make them stronger?
Yes, Chief. That's why we came to seek your approval. The Minister of Finance has already threatened to jump off a building.
We can't afford so much money either. The military needs money, but don't we need money for national development and people's livelihood construction? If it's really not feasible, let's just sell military equipment, which happens to promote the research of the next generation of weapons.
But who can we sell it to?
(Divergent route: MDA route)
MDA, because we have a surrender agreement, we cannot sell to others, and we have just signed a non aggression treaty, which is also beneficial for strengthening our relationship.
This is a choice, but MDA has a relatively complete military system, and our market may be relatively narrow.
This is just a preliminary route, let's handle it this way for now, it's not necessary to find them. Perhaps before that, we need to prepare something…

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    As the beginning of this series of events, a best ending and a worst ending were set from the very beginning.

    Pinned one month ago
  • Profile image
    36.9k Graingy

    "Gib money"
    -Every military force ever.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
    Bigger naval fleet? Noice.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover speaking of money, I just bought 5 of these

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover we literally own 3 different other businesses

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover so is ACI

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
    Y'all are forgetting that lore TUPL is a literal money generator
    Anyways, I think we might buy stuff, but we'll have to see what everyone else thinks.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ fair

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 me too. But there is a saying in the business world, don't look for demand, but create demand.
    Of course, the means must be legal

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ well, I don't really care what you build, I like to build things myself

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 What I mean is, since you're sure I haven't expressed any intention of starting a war, what else do you really want?

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Do you want to see things like A-fired B-guided missiles, satellite detection, artillery guided drones, data links, electromagnetic interference, and beyond visual range strikes in this world?

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ you said you divided your weapons into 2 worlds, and then you said the definition of your weapon is determined by TUPL, I don't understand

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ huh?

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 … ? So what do you want?

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ don't quite understand what you are saying

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Oh, by the way, due to the deviation in our war game theory after the Fourth Military Reform. So I divided my weapons into two worlds. In the world with MDA, the definition of my weapon is entirely determined by TUPL. You know what this means.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ 1. I do understand why you chose the MDA, because of the treaty
    2. the treaty means nothing, you (or us) could just break the treaty

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 ? I only remember saying that we should start an arms race. You are afraid that I will start a war, and I am also afraid that you will start a war. What do you think is the significance of signing a non aggression treaty?

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Also, this matter will not prevent future changes. Lack of funding is just a reason to enter this event. What needs to be developed will continue to develop, what needs to be manufactured will continue to be manufactured, and only some other things will change. You really don't understand why I chose MDA.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ did you not say you had intentions to start a war, I might have misunderstood, also, I don't have complete hostility, more so wariness

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You maintain hostility towards me, I understand. We are not completely in the same camp, and I am also wary of backing you. Perhaps we need more time. You can also choose not to buy.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ yes, and that is what worries me particularly the plane and rocket department

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    4,069 JSTQ

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 … So, have you read the article carefully?

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @JSTQ that is true, however, I tend to cover most of my needs myself, and occasionally I'll get some stuff from TUPL

    one month ago
  • Log in to see more comments