Sooo... Remember the Italian triangle cult?

They've been delt with. Hornets had to be used.

If only they were of the insect sort...

In any case, we might have another issue on our hands.
See, Graingy has a long history of aircraft often sharing two traits:
Simplicity and ruggedness.
Much of the ruggedness is derived from a mixture of god-killing durability (just saying, if a Graingy aircraft hit a building that shite would overpen) and freakishly powerful engines.
This is all well and good most of the time, it's what we do, but, see, we've come to realize that perhaps the engine design team may be a bit... nuts.

What caused us to finally realize this?

Finding the lead propulsion engineer at the American plant hunched over a drafting table (pencil and paper, in the digital age, mind you) in a dark office late one night uttering "More... More..." repeatedly to herself.
Do note, the engine design she was going over was the GLBTA-579-B. For those who are not well-acquainted with the history of Graingy engineering, this is the engine used by early models of GHF-79 "Archfiend" heavy jet fighters.

This thing produces 250kN wet.

Anyways, myself and a few others have come to realize this obsession with raw power may be getting a tad unhealthy. Any ideas on how to curb this?

Lethal means rejected with prejudice.