Profile image

The return of the Black Hawk family

8,380 Airheaddivision  11 days ago

After getting up close and personal with this aircraft, I’ve dealt with the minor issues that I needed to fix on my older builds.

What’s the difference?

1 it has less parts (sort of) than previous builds and has proper weight and lifting capabilities.

2 I will be making a lot more variations of this aircraft.

3 will be able to fold its tail and rotors for easier storage in tight places.(hopefully)

And 4 the tail is all one fuselage so it won’t be too tail heavy

Things that I will try to implement:

I want it to fit inside a c-17 and be able to be loaded in and out of it, particularly for simple planes 2. (I’ve successfully done this with a C-130 so it should be possible with use of magnets to hold the aircraft down).

Same thing goes with landing on a battle ship I have, hopefully I can store it in the built in hanger.

And finally aerial refueling, which should actually be harder than what I’ve listed.

And not to bore you anymore, here is the pics.

I couldn’t make the nose any better than this as you can really only do so much with it. I have another nose but this one seemed to work better.

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    Will you also make the Firehawk like in last time.?

    16 hours ago
  • Profile image

    @FaLLin1 I’ll keep that in mind, thanks

    +1 10 days ago
  • Profile image
    2,962 FaLLin1

    remember less drag for the fuselage part the better flight level especially for the mid air refueling (set drag count to 0 or ur desired value cuz with 0 drag for the overall hull will make the heli hard to slow down )

    10 days ago
  • Profile image

    T

    10 days ago