Profile image

Suggestion regarding the new BETA

25.2k kikasshes  8.6 years ago

As we now have a car engine, why not add water propellers that could be driven by the car engine?

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @kikasshes YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @FrankieB We got VTOL as an input for control surfaces!!!

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @kikasshes ywah

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Coo @kikasshes

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @Upquark jag @FrankieB now we have .25 in length too

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @Upquark yeah I would

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    I could not, also 0.25 rise plus run would be great @FrankieB

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PlanesOfOld We will try and get some more info out soon about the mobile beta. We are shooting for next Friday, best case scenario.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    43.9k PlanesOfOld

    Curved is useful for some things, EG boats, Bomb Bays and making things look more curved, (smooth makes everything almost square if it's big) so a circular option would be a great addition and it would save SO MANY of my projects that I've started but never finished due to the daunting task of trying to make a large circular fuselage, an example would be my AVRO Vulcan that has been sitting in the builder for at least 9 months gathering dust whilst I've waited for larger circles to be added! Please! I would give everything for large circles :D
    PS wheels and engines look top notch! Give the lads at Jundroo my applause!
    PPS any info on IOS beta??? I know there's no chance of the new islands to be added but any news of what else may be implemented and when? Would be rly helpful to know :) @AndrewGarrison

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    17.4k Geekpride

    @AndrewGarrison I'd like to be able to have fully circular fuselage pieces at >2 diameter. I'd say to leave the current curved corner in and add the fully circular as an additional option. Or - and I'm guessing this would be a lot of work and might not be possible - set the fuselage edge settings to a roundness slider. So 0% would be completely square, like the existing Hard setting, while 100% would be fully circular.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    i have an idea bomb racks and missle ones to i made this comment on the annoucement

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @AndrewGarrison I don't really care about the current curved at >2 diameter. Let the smooth option be what curved is today (for >2 diameter) and curved be completely circular for every diameter.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    137k BaconEggs

    @AndrewGarrison I don't really like the curve at 5. I think keep the curved then add circular, so we have more options.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @kikasshes I'll add the 0.25 length today. The circular fuselage pieces is a much bigger thing, not sure I will get to that. Does anyone like the behavior of Curved at > 2 diameter? If I were to do this task, should I just get rid of the existing Curved and replace it with Circular behavior?

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @AndrewGarrison The 0.25 steps in diameter were nice (talking about fuselage blocks) , but why can't we have down to 0.25 blocks in length too? And with the new airliner engine we need to be able to make cylinders with diameters larger than 2 which is the current limit. (square airliners look so bad!) Maybe add a new corner type called 'circle' .

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @Upquark i think you can, idk though

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Yhea @kikasshes , that's what I meant, fuselage length

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    With a fuselage cone? @FrankieB

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @kikasshes oh, I thought he meant diameter

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @FrankieB @Upquark But not in length, just diameter

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @Upquark not for me in the beta I went to 0.25 no XML

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @kikasshes yeah

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @FrankieB Yes that's what I mean. If they could just add basic flaps first we could push them for fancier stuff later

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Also, really devs? Amazing job with the beta, but still, 0.5 is still the smallest we can go????? Wut

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @kikasshes yeah, but for know, I just want basic flaps

    8.6 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments