OVERVIEW:
The GP-134B Celadon has received mixed reception compared to its predecessor. While there were a few improvements in terms of hardpoint placement, simplification of powerplant, and survivability, test pilots who flew the first variant did not feel that this variant addresses several major complaints, notably the sub-optimal rocket pylons that make it difficult for ground crews to access and the machine's excessive size.

COMBAT PERFORMANCE:
The aircraft's range under a full combat load is still good due to its large fuel capacity. The lack of thrust vectoring increased the takeoff roll significantly.

The manually-activated air brakes were appreciated, but would have preferred them connected to the VTOL slider.

INTEGRAL FIREPOWER:
The addition of the two Mk 9 cannon in addition to the eight Mk 6 rotary guns provide it reasonable anti-material capabilities.

EXTERNAL LOADS:
The external weapons load is far superior to that of the Pummeler or the Boar, although eight of its twenty-four hardpoints cannot accept bombs nor drop tanks. The missile pylons are much better placed, but the rockets are still in a sub-optimal location. The Pilotmario Air Force was not particularly impressed by its layout, but found it suitable given current strategy.

DURABILITY:
The type appeared quite durable to battle damage due to the multiple redundancies in the design. Asymmetrical thrust was not an issue. The fuselage tanks have since been toughened with armor and self-sealing liner, although the wing tanks are still somewhat vulnerable.

VISIBILITY:
Cockpit visibility is very good frontally thanks to its short nose. While the Boar is slightly superior in this regard, it is far better compared to the Pummeler.

LOGISTICS:
This is the primary concern most pilots had with the aircraft, and involve the placement of the hardpoints. The rocket pod pylons are difficult to mount weapons on upon due to its positioning. While the placement of the rocket pod pylons on the upper wing were a certain improvement, their placement means that each pod must be man-handled into position, increasing the arming time by 50%. No issues were reported with the lower hardpoints.

The J50 powerplants were a logistical boon, however. Fighter Command still operates aircraft with the J50, and therefore parts were not an issue.

OFF THE BOOKS:
Pilotmario Air Force High Command does not have great confidence in the Celadon design, and would suggest a significant redesign.