Profile image

Who would win?

67.8k PINK  8.4 years ago

HAL AMCA
F-35
YF-23
MiG-1.42/1.44
J-20 (MiG-1.42)
Su-35
MiG-35
Su-50/T-50
J-31 (twin engine F-35)
S400 family

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    Yep@Dart

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    I don't think they would, besides, materials used to increase the stealthyness of aircraft can be very heavy and sensitive. @Thomasj041

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.3k Thomasj041

    Maybe the F22 is faster than people think, because the government is hiding classified information about the plane. Maybe.

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    Almost all of the planes listed are; faster, have super cruise, and have a better electronics suit. @Gmanndo1000

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @PINK woah

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    .....That is now the norm for any newer planes. @Gmanndo1000

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @PINK Mach one without afterburner Mach 2 easily

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    The F-22 isn't very fast.... @Gmanndo1000

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @ThunderstormAerospaceIndustries Yep

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Gmanndo1000 no the F-35

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @Gmanndo1000 F-22's built for speed

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @ThunderstormAerospaceIndustries The F-22?

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Gmanndo1000 bulky, ugly, poor weaponry, Heck, even the A-10 would destroy it in air-to-air. Slow as well.

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @PINK I've seen it do combat missions in Afghanistan on YouTube, it was thought of in the Cold War, so it was built to take on high tech fighters, now their not used much because well, ISIS doesn't have fighter jets.

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    It is pretty bad, to the point of never being combat ready, and doesn't have a reliable electronics suit. It is infact pretty bad, same as the F-35. @Gmanndo1000

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @PINK How About the F-22 Raptor? I know it's not in here but it's a dang good fighter

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    No, it is mostly the Marines need for a jet that can take off and land anywhere. The only STOVL that I could see being effective in combat is the Yak-141. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    They don't carry as many weapons as the Su-35, which carry 10-14 missiles so they know they gonna hit. The F-35 carries 4, and as both missile types are not perfect, they might not allways work. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @PINK yea, I don't trust that engine flip system one bit. The Air Force just needs to give the marines a few decent jets.

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    The Harrier is piss poor as well, however, as the F-35 was never originally a STOVL....which makes it even more deadly to the man flying it. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @MikuKat yep, also replacing the harrier

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,078 MikuKat

    @Gmanndo1000 replacing the a-10.....

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    @PINK In an aircraft book I have, they can carry a TON of weapons, atleast give em' that.

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    67.8k PINK

    No, they are not stealthy, acept from the front and back with some types of radar. They are also inherently bad at flying because they are VTOL. @Gmanndo1000

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,496 Gmanndo1000

    F-35's don't suck, they're stealthy, VTOL, and can carry a B-61 Nuclear Bomb.@MikuKat @ThunderstormAerospaceIndustries

    8.4 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments