@MAHADI ami abar ota ekdom parina!

@AviownCorp ei jonne majhe moddhe ami ektu ulta-palta jinis banai...

@Supermini555 the problem is the liking my friend

I don't care whether it's simplistic or not, if I like it, I upvote it!

@Supermini555 just see what KCferrari have said.

@oDDDynamics new users are joining too

@CaesiciusPlanes i live in St. Louis and it is 81 degrees and thunder storming. Currently I'm in Florida and its 84 degrees and sunny and I was in Seattle which is really cool and it's 73 degrees and partly cloudy.

KCFerrari gave a very nice and detailed description of his perspective upon why your planes don't get as much attention/work ratio. so here's my explanation from my point. as KCFerrari mentioned. " Don't take offence. Personally, your planes are not of great interest to me because of their simplicity, and i'm sure many others have the same reasoning" I've gave the same criticism to Disfer. and he accepted it. I sure hope you do too. I don't really care for a majority of planes on this site and yours are within that circle. so an upvote or two to show you're not ignored is crucial for this community to maintain its kindness. KC Also said " You make a good clean plane, but at the end of the day it's too simple. You say that they're basically foolproof and can be flown by children. " which is true. your airplanes are very easy to fly and very nice to pilot but in the end of the day. it honestly matters about what it can do. a majority of planes have something different Atleast something in them. I'm not saying yours are the same. I'm just saying. something totally different attracts a ridiculous amount of attention. now, you being a Platinum user, you would already know that so I believe this post was just a reminder. I do think your planes look quite amazing and to be honest. I am wowed everytime I open your profile. but like I said. features. something extraordinary

Good planes mabey, but eccelent planes.... Nope this is why I have no idea who the hell you are.....

You seem to want some reasoning, so I'll oblige with some criticism. Don't take offence. Personally, your planes are not of great interest to me because of their simplicity, and i'm sure many others have the same reasoning. You make a good clean plane, but at the end of the day it's too simple. You say that they're basically foolproof and can be flown by children. That's a testament to good flying characteristics, but it has no charm in it. I like a plane that has a few kinks, as well as features that may be hard to use, but very rewarding if you can use it. I'm a massive fan of low speed supermaneuverability and vtol. Kids will crash it and I know it. However, I find it very fun to master. You also say you won't post useless showpieces. I agree with you in some accounts, as many of those are entirely artificial in their flight. It's just a great model that flies with brute force. However, I feel that a beautiful model with perfect flight and features is the ultimate goal. Wasted parts count is no good, but there's a happy medium, and yours come off as too easy. I look at them and say - meh, I could build that easily. I'm after things that I CAN'T build, or would take a great deal of effort. Anyway, I hope this perspective helps you.

I upvote almost all of your planes.

@Flightsonic I will stick to my decision, I won't post any useless showpiece for brainless users. Even with just one download and no upvote

@AviownCorp same, but is it worth the effort? Are low quality planes the new attention grabber?

@Flightsonic whatever may be but I won't post any good looking junk

@AviownCorp I don't know of that'll help, it's something else

@Flightsonic should we try cars now?

@AviownCorp I looked over it again, and it looks like downloads are dipping too

@Flightsonic what is happening? We are platinum but still...

@AviownCorp This isn't about overall popularity, it's about a large dip in attention. You see, both of our average upvotes are dipping

@Flightsonic but just compare our last two uploads please

For example, this which I spent a total of 23 hours or so (across 3 days), I'd assume it would've got more attention with 130 followers, but no, apparently it doesn't

@CaesiciusPlanes whatever but it is not a huge difference compared to USA

@Flightsonic but I think you get better response than me dear

Sorry I couldn't type at the moment, I'm suffering from the same issue, and I don't know why

@CaesiciusPlanes more or less 4h