Why?
@BaconEggs hmm ok
PUT YOUR GEAR UP JOHNNY!
@REW I did try to replicate that one, which works good enough. I figured out that it wasn't a severe problem, and doesn't have an effect at all.
@kikasshes @JovianPat Pretty much on every part.
Have you used the disableAircraftCollisions="true" line for those parts?
Part collision and clipping?
Idk.I can't see more details......zoom in please. Try this one. built by my friend. https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5cnYQY/777gear6
@Feanor It's 209 ft long, which would equate to 63.7 m. I really hope they buff the strength on the rotators and the wheels, or an .xml option for that.
How large is it? From my experience, aircraft over 50 metres long tend to be a little wobbly.
@REW any help on this? I know you're good with this kind of stuff.
@BaconEggs hmm ok
PUT YOUR GEAR UP JOHNNY!
@REW I did try to replicate that one, which works good enough. I figured out that it wasn't a severe problem, and doesn't have an effect at all.
@kikasshes @JovianPat Pretty much on every part.
Have you used the disableAircraftCollisions="true" line for those parts?
Part collision and clipping?
Idk.I can't see more details......zoom in please.
Try this one. built by my friend.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5cnYQY/777gear6
@Feanor It's 209 ft long, which would equate to 63.7 m. I really hope they buff the strength on the rotators and the wheels, or an .xml option for that.
How large is it? From my experience, aircraft over 50 metres long tend to be a little wobbly.
@REW any help on this? I know you're good with this kind of stuff.