@MechWARRIOR57 A. I did not specify that these were fighters that I was talking about, thus your comment is invalid. B. I have made many fighters with rotators. Example: Thunderhawk Engineering Wendigo. This was a multirole fighter with rotators on the canards and V-tail. Please correct your opinion.
@EliteIndustries1 it was one of my pet peeves. I felt I needed to let it go as the pressure from more and more builded up inside me I had to write this.
@Testin123 true.
Wanna know what I hate more? when my chips are 70% air and 30% chips.
@MechWARRIOR57 A. I did not specify that these were fighters that I was talking about, thus your comment is invalid. B. I have made many fighters with rotators. Example: Thunderhawk Engineering Wendigo. This was a multirole fighter with rotators on the canards and V-tail. Please correct your opinion.
Lol
Wings with control surfaces are way easier to make
Well from my point of view, control surfaces work better. And besides, rotators are usually quite floppy.
Lol me to
I've been using rotators lately
@EliteIndustries1 @MechWARRIOR57 dudes you overdid it.
maybe before you make a post like this you should be doing it (your announcing this even though you don't use rotators yourself)
plus, ive looked through your posts, you have not made a single aircraft that uses rotators
dude, this is useless, you try making an aircraft with rotators instead of control surfaces
*built
@EliteIndustries1 it was one of my pet peeves. I felt I needed to let it go as the pressure from more and more builded up inside me I had to write this.