Looney tick @BaconEggs

@WEAPONSMITH I've seen that episode countless times, I just decided it would be time to change gears.

I mean the BaconEggs is retarded one. XD@BaconEggs

@jamesPLANESii I think there already is flex tape memes since the jontron episode on it

Done. It's me now. @BaconEggs

It's processing... @BaconEggs

Me change my profile pic until someone make flex tape meme... @BaconEggs

@jamesPLANESii It's time for flex tape, no more dogs anymore

Oh no... @BaconEggs

@jamesPLANESii No, see
phil swift here with flex tape!

Really? You last said dog only 4 hours ago... @BaconEggs

Looks like your profile meme pic is outdated

Ok then. @WNP78

@jamesPLANESii nope.... Except to make that engine do nothing and use a hidden engine.
Perhaps you could build a custom engine, scale the stock engine down and then scale up the prop (diameter controls overall scale).

@WNP78

XD @DemonSniper8

You can with xml I think, just change how it works. When you said you were building a beaver I thought you meant the animal lmao

For example, any of my mechs, or my space battleship "low part version"

In my past xp with such projects, i find that building the engine as a sub, then building the plane, then frakensteining the two together actually works really well

RIP. Idk any toher solutions, especially because the way SP is codded, i dont think it is even possible to disable them, short of coding an engine from scratch @jamesPLANESii

I don't really want to do that. :/ @Exofalt

That would skyrocket the part count and make building in that area incredibly fiddly. @Exofalt

I would reccomend cutsom building an engine, for example, taking the small engine, building something that looks like the big engine around it, and XML modding its HP