@ThunderscreechEngineering that is possible. However, Russia claims to have evidence in British involvement in the gas attack. Of course, we will probably never know for sure. It smells like it's all going to plan for both US and Russia. And that people of Syria are again means for some foreign politicians to settle their disputes over money.

@EternalDarkness Maybe the attackers were trying to provoke an attack

Cough

Terrorist groups

Cough

That’s good to hear you have a reliable network. All we have here are CNN (retarded) and CTV/CBC (even more retarded). @EternalDarkness

@EternalDarkness to be honest in the messed up world we live in nothing suprises me

@Botfinder @BaconAircraft @AircroftDesigin read below please. I forgot to tag you.

It's a pre-arranged scenario. Notice how the "chemical attack" happened just days after allied coalition said that they will attack if there's a chemical attack. They apparently did just that. However, when you look into some details known so far, Syrian military airport seems to have been evacuated days before the attack, and that chemical plants (if they were even actual chemical plants) were cleared of chemicals and personnel. This we can conclude from the lack of reported victims and chemical fallout. Also, they aimed as far from the Russian positions as they could, and Emmanuel Macron said that Russia was informed in advance.
Why I doubt that there was an actual chemical attack? Well, just look at the video of cleaning up its aftermath. They are sanitising the area and affected people with water instead of appropriate chemicals for neutralising the poison. Also, nobody is wearing a gas mask or any other protective equipment.
I come from a country that is mostly neutral in this matter, and my informations mostly come from our national network, so I consider them reliable. I have also done a brief research on the internet to compare them to other sources.

@BaconAircraft I know that Russia and syria are less than happy about this but it proves to other countries that the Un will not tolerate chemical wepons

@Botfinder @AircroftDesigin @RailfanEthan
Let's not forget how close Syria is to Russia as Syria is literally next to their border. Plus, no nation in the worlds like random countries across the Atlantic to stick their noses into conflicts that are totally unreleated to the wellbeing of their own country.

Imagine Russia sending an airstrike on Canada if it had a regime like that of Syria... I'm sure the U.S. won't be happy, as they feel threatened that conflict is at their doorsteps. Same goes with Russia - a country across the atlantic bombing a country near their border; ofcourse they feel threatened.

I live in Canada and like to stay neutral in most arguments, however how the media is treating this one in particular is so brainlessly one-sided, it gets on my nerves.

@RailfanEthan yeah...

If the three top allied (US, UK, France) countries decide a attack on Russian supplied troops is needed... i meannnnnn, UN is onto something