Profile image

USS Beast- Old vs New size comparison

50.6k UnguidedCylinder  5.7 years ago

I use ol' Defiant here for scale, Defiant is 992.7ft (302.6m) and the new carrier is definitely larger and much more impressive
Here be 1.0

Here be 2.0

I like it, more room to land and less crashing

Edit: Defiant is a battlecruiserrrr

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @8bitgamer33 about two months ago

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    How long ago was this?

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,986 JediWolf

    @Indecision that thing is MICROSCOPIC! it's nearly impossible to land on it 😵

    +2 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,828 Indecision

    @Stormfur the USS Tiny still exists if you want a dangerous landing

    5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @XjayIndustrys spawning a big ship on the rear end of a carrier is a good idea

    5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    lol I saw the first one and was like well, how did that happen...
    attaches engines to front of battleship facing up...

    5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    I love how the revamped USS Beast is 2x the size of the old USS Beast since the size standard for modern SP designs has pretty much doubled compared to when SP was still very simple in parts and limiting in size.

    5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Yes@Notaleopard

    5.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.5k DemonSniper8

    Attach a catapult connecter to the battleship and let the fun begin

    +7 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.8k Stormfur

    well they took the fun out of carrier landing....

    +2 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    38.7k ZetaAvalon

    @Spacedoge12345plane
    Airplanes and Ships Switch places in 1.8

    +1 5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    More room to take off and land a battleship I see

    +4 5.7 years ago