Profile image

Should they replace the Ticonderoga-Class Cruiser?

6,005 Lahoski107  5.5 years ago


Discuss


P.S. - that thang is UGLY

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    A cruiser cannot be replaced by a destroyer they both are ment for 2 different types of warfare

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    15 goji

    i like this crusier

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,005 Lahoski107

    @KommandoblankDroid ew

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Ticonderoga is ugly

    Wait until you see the USS Long Beach!

    +1 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    40.2k Typhoon03

    @Brields95 That's not what we're talking about.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    I think that Jundroo should upgrade the destroyers, yes.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    Mod DeezDucks

    I think the U.S Navy should be more concerned with acquiring frigates first, the Ticonderoga seems adequate. compared to countries it's likely to face, any shortcomings seem to be supplemented by the Arleigh Burke's.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    No they shouldn't

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Lahoski107 Speaking of corvettes, I have made one but cannot upload until my ban expires on my main account.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Lahoski107 Eh, I’m not too sure. We just don’t really need them I guess.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,005 Lahoski107

    @BlasTechIndustries come to think of it, why don’t we have any corvettes?

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Lahoski107 I guess you could say that lol

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,005 Lahoski107

    @BlasTechIndustries that is true. So I guess we came with a conclusion:

    Arleigh-Burke-Class Destroyers RULE THE SEA!!!

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Lahoski107 Search Hyper Velocity Projectile.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    It is not cheap making brand new cruisers and destroyers. The US doesn’t have that much money to be spending on useless new ships that are not needed yet.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,005 Lahoski107

    @BlasTechIndustries hollow tip? Lol

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Lahoski107 Well, you are in luck. In recent years, they developed a new round which can reach 35 miles.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,005 Lahoski107

    @BlasTechIndustries 30-40 miles.
    .
    .
    sobs and starts crying for the railgun to come back

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Lahoski107 How much range do you think is needed?

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,005 Lahoski107

    @BlasTechIndustries I guess you’re right. But mk54 systems lack range from what I hear. And the Zumwalt's stealth will be useful.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Lahoski107 Why is that?

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Lahoski107 The AGS is quite pricey. Especially the ammunition which is used. I see nothing wrong with the newer Mk. 45 systems.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,005 Lahoski107

    @BlasTechIndustries maybe not replace it but we need new cruisers

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    This is a matter of maintaining said vessels. Ticonderoga is quite modern and does not need a replacement.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,005 Lahoski107

    @BlasTechIndustries they are working on that... I think we need to replace our current 5”/54 guns with advanced weapons systems with the 6” guns and not the rail gun.

    5.5 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments