Profile image

X-7 - Corporeal J

7,307 OtterOfToast  8.8 years ago
Auto Credit Based on OtterOfToast's X-7 - Corporeal B

Seriously-- do tell me if I'm putting out too many Corporeal iterations or if I should start taking down older ones. Anywho- this one is a lot lighter that the G (4,000 lbs. lighter), is faster and more stable. It has a small problem with dropping and the inlets produce a lot of drag, but that will be taken care of in the next version. Yes.... There will be more.

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor X-7 - Corporeal B
  • Successors 2 airplane(s) +14 bonus
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 34.9ft (10.6m)
  • Length 46.5ft (14.2m)
  • Height 14.0ft (4.3m)
  • Empty Weight 19,105lbs (8,665kg)
  • Loaded Weight 37,357lbs (16,944kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 3.609
  • Wing Loading 57.0lbs/ft2 (278.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 654.9ft2 (60.8m2)
  • Drag Points 5382

Parts

  • Number of Parts 95
  • Control Surfaces 6
  • Performance Cost 585
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    7,307 OtterOfToast

    @Xogo Wonderful! I added a tail modification and used those wing tips from your design, as well as messed around with the flaps, too. Thank you. It now breaks 1000 mph! Now to just make it faster.

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,203 Xogo

    @@OtterOfToast
    Allright, she's up - https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Io02zE/X-7-Corporeal-X-2

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,307 OtterOfToast

    @@Xogo You go right ahead! I'm working on one meself, so we could merge the two into the Corporeal K :D

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,203 Xogo

    @@OtterOfToast No problem. BTW, would you permit me to put up another, based off this one? I've been playing around again.

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Wow, that would be neat@@OtterOfToast

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,307 OtterOfToast

    @@Hadesrocks I wonder if one day this design will be real. It'd be really neat to see it hanging in a museum a good 100 years from now :3

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,307 OtterOfToast

    @@Xogo I did know the inlets at the bottom weren't working correctly, but I figured I'd keep them for a few versions to try and see if they looked like one long inlet, but looking back, I might just end up taking them all off like you said and try something else. And thanks for the tail design :33 I noticed it had serious stalling issues on takeoff with the canards on, so I toggled them to see if that would help for smaller movements, and it did :3 Thank you for that design, btw <3

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,203 Xogo

    Yo, I'm back. Im sure you figured this out, but I thought I'd make sure you know that when you put inlets as close as you have on the bottom they stop working, and block each other's airflow. You can pull off all of those, as well as some of the ones on top of the engines, and still have full airflow. I gotta say, I like the touch of the all moving tailplane being toggleable. Definately helps with controllability.

    8.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    No don't take any down

    8.8 years ago