Profile image

Incendius (mobile version)

197k SledDriver  7.2 years ago
328 downloads
No Tags

SCREENSHOTS (link in comments)

https://imgur.com/a/UeynA

DESKTOP VERSION (link in comments)

https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/p1Fxpl/Incendius

NOTE: Custom camera 1 is cockpit view.

Combining a high-velocity Boom 50 autocannon, 48 incendiary launchers, and two 50mm gatling guns, the Incendius redefines the modern weapons platform. Able to destroy any target in the map with a choice of weapons, and capable of evading and shooting down incoming missiles, the Incendius is a war machine like no other. Heavily armoured, it's also capable of withstanding virtually unlimited cannon fire and even a few direct missile impacts.

FLIGHT CONTROLS

Retract gear to power up the engines. Then use:

- pitch to move up and down
- pitch with AG3 to change pitch
- roll to turn
- yaw to strafe
- AG1 to move forward
- AG2 to move backward

WEAPON CONTROLS

- 'Launch Countermeasures' to fire incendiary rounds
- Air-to-ground mode to arm autocannon, FireWeapons to fire
- FireGuns to fire gatling guns

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 157.5ft (48.0m)
  • Length 165.9ft (50.6m)
  • Height 41.5ft (12.7m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 468,703lbs (212,600kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.891
  • Wing Loading N/A
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 356760

Parts

  • Number of Parts 211
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 1,776
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @OhKnights Use the tracerColor attribute, it takes a hex value (FF0000 for red, FF9900 for orange, 00FFFF for cyan, etc.)

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Hey How to change bullet or fire colors of miniguns or wing gun

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.1k Rodrigo110

    Great! We all have our different opinions, and we can go about our profiles in whichever way we choose. Have a good one @SledDriver

    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @Rodrigo110 What you call a drawback is, to me, a benefit to me and even more so to other users. People can more easily find the version they prefer, and I get the satisfaction that my additional work was not in vain. As for clutter, if a build is good, it will get upvotes and stay on the "hottest" pages for a while; if not, it won't. Anyway, this is more time than I like to spend on what is, to me, a non-issue.

    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.1k Rodrigo110

    The drawback to me is cluttered upload pages; as it shows different variations of the same aircraft, and I prefer to just have a list of all the different creations. This is probably only an issue to me, but everyone has their quirks! I don’t find your way unprofessional, it’s just (going back to the cluttered upload page) not professional in the way that defines the way I organise my profile (everyone has different ways of being professional.) Inappropriate was said in a different context that is widely used, I simply meant that we have seperate methods, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver
    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @Rodrigo110 No hard feelings at all. I still don't get what the drawbacks are, or what's inappropriate or less strictly professional about my way, but to each his own.

    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.1k Rodrigo110

    An interesting conclusion, I too find that when I post mobile friendly versions as unlisted they don’t get as many downloads, but my attempts to find whether they’re are more mobile or PC users are inconclusive. I wouldn’t upload it as mobile friendly, but that’s just me, and I like to keep matters strictly professional. I can understand your way of operating, and I respect that; but as I said, it was not a criticism, simply a suggestion. Making it more accessible has its benefits, but to me the drawbacks outweigh other methods, though to you I can see it’s different. We all have seperate procedures to deal with such anomalies, and I respect yours as I hope you respect mine. It was not meant to be offensive in any way, and I hope you are not vexed by the comment. No hard feelings? @SledDriver

    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @Rodrigo110 I don't think it's inappropriate. I had to spend time and effort to make this, whether it's simpler or more complex is irrelevant. Furthermore, this way, more people will see and download this version, thereby making my effort more meaningful than if just one or two people downloaded it. I've tried uploading different versions as unlisted links before, and hardly anyone downloaded them. So if I'm going to put in the effort to accommodate a custom request, I might as well make it public to maximise its utility.

    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.1k Rodrigo110

    I don’t have anything against upvotes, it’s just that the original (which I really like) is the main source, and that a mobile version is a secondary, ‘lite’, version that is accessed by those incapable of running the original. Because of this, I feel as if it’s innaprioate to get upvotes for a simpler version of a more complex version which is existent. The people who enjoy the mobile one should upvote the normal one, and that’s an efficient, easy to run system that results in one creation that everyone can access and upvote, and another which is accessible through the first. I don’t have an issue with what you’re doing, it’s just a suggestion, not a criticism @SledDriver

    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    197k SledDriver

    @Rodrigo110 What's this crazy thing a lot of people on this site seem to have about upvotes, as if they're something dirty? Someone asked me to make a mobile version, I had to spend some time to build this, why shouldn't it get upvotes?

    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.1k Rodrigo110

    Just a suggestion, you should probably upload the mobile version as unlisted and have a link to it in the description of the standard version; that way you don’t get multiple extra upvotes from the same design

    7.2 years ago