X-52 "Clearsky"
A design with no wings whatsoever
The X-52 Clearsky
It was first developed in 2032 as a military aircraft with hypermanverability, but, it was considered a noneffective dogfighter, so the project was scrapped. however, two years later, the old filing clerk of the military found the design under an old stack of papers. He submitted the design as a stunt aircraft, two weeks later, it was approved, It was first revealed at a small airshow in Colorado, the people loved it so it started appearing in more and more airshows, eventually, it became so popular that it became it's own thing, not just small airshows anymore, no, people would pay thousands of dollars to see it loop around and do backflips, it was a multi-million dollar enterprise.It would travel the world doing it's shows on every continent, all at the same time gathering more popularity, people flocked by the thousands to every new location where it was to perform, and that old filing clerk, well, he became rich.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 32.5ft (9.9m)
- Length 24.4ft (7.5m)
- Height 5.2ft (1.6m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 5,939lbs (2,694kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 11.35
- Wing Loading 439,839.3lbs/ft2 (2,147,483.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 3853
Parts
- Number of Parts 69
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 435
@Nicelogo57 lol
6ix9ine parts
@Airlancashire yes, take it apart, you will see i am telling the truth
What? Is that even possible? @50CalChicken
@Airlancashire oh, it has no wing parts at all, nothing was used from the wings section if you know what i mean.
I tried this earlier with another user and we both got no points @50CalChicken
I want to know how you made a wing with no vertical stabilizers @50CalChicken
@pitia thanks
@50CalChicken yeah I think I got it, very fun
@pitia with pitch and throttle, it's hard, but doable
It's incredibly cool, especially considering that is 69 parts only and doesn't absolutely have wings, but how can one make it fly straight?
@Airlancashire so no experiment? hopefully the tooth is nothing bad, just maybe a small filling.
@Airlancashire oh no, that's not good
No more uploads for a month I broke my tooth and it’s bleeding @50CalChicken
@Airlancashire and if by stabilizers you mean the wing pieces, none.
@Airlancashire what do you mean stabilizers?
@Oscar17 Thanks, it is odd to fly huh
@TheRealJBerry @DaCat9 Thanks
Idk how u make it fly without wings and its flight characteristic are incredibly unique
How you make wing with no stabilizers