Profile image

Sukhoi Su-65b Farsco

1,670 DaDerpachu123  4.9 years ago
61 downloads

A fictuous Soviet Interceptor. The Su-65b Farsco is a Soviet propeller driven plane with the unique feature of using counter-rotating blades. This provides the plane with insane acceleration and a top speed of around 780 km/h. The Ruski aircraft is also naval capable, allowing the soviet navy the ability to catch enemy fighters that threaten it. It is reasonably armed, with 4 20mm ShKas cannons. They are unusually located on the wings, which is against the russian "Centralized Fire" air doctrine. This is so as the engine of the craft is simply too large. The one flaw with the plane is that it tends to roll slightly to the right on takeoff and flight due to the natural rotation of the blades.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 30.9ft (9.4m)
  • Length 30.5ft (9.3m)
  • Height 12.1ft (3.7m)
  • Empty Weight 5,588lbs (2,534kg)
  • Loaded Weight 7,011lbs (3,180kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.57
  • Wing Loading 34.5lbs/ft2 (168.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 203.2ft2 (18.9m2)
  • Drag Points 2187

Parts

  • Number of Parts 93
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 362
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @TrislandianAlliance to be honest, I have no idea. My refined version fixes that tho

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Trainzo Hmm... (Thinking about My DS1000 Super airliner that uses inverted TU-95 Bear Engine)

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Huh, weird, why does it auto roll, a counter rotating propeller should be eliminating that (realistically) my plane that use counter rotating prop (a lot actually) doesn't have this problem whatsoever

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @DaDerpachu123 show me anyway. Maybe I have some ideas to help you out

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 Nvm, Its probably too little

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @DaDerpachu123 Depends on how much is done. Tag me in it so I can see

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 It is very basic right now :(

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 Hey Mustang, I finished with the overall ship. It has 3 gun turrets and an anti-air vulcan turret. May I hand it over to you so you can detail it?

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @DaDerpachu123 okay no problem :)

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 yeah that would be great!

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @DaDerpachu123 I can help you touch it up if you need

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 well, I don't plan it to look very good, just functional

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @DaDerpachu123 I’ve never really built ships before so I’m not sure how much he’ll I would be there.

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 hey Mustang, I want to build a battleship for my next project. I don't have much experience however, would you like to collab? If you don't want to, do you know anyone who is willing to lend some tips?

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AircraftoftheRedStar Wow, I didn't know that. I'll change that. Any Ideas?

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Very nice aircraft. Although you should reconsider the reporting name. Fighter aircraft have names with an “F” (good job), and one syllable. Your has two, which would identify as a jet aircraft. I love the design though, it’s very cool!!

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Trainzo Lol

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @teodor99 Thanks for your feedback, I'll make sure that I will fix that

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    42.7k Trainzo

    @DaDerpachu123 , with a Tu Bear engine, why not .

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.5k teodor99

    this plane is definitely a nice design. tho the only real critique is the rear end of the fuselages design being rather shoddily done. but overall its a good enough design. 9/10

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 Thats great! Thanks!

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @DaDerpachu123 that is true. It’s probably mostly because of the high power. At lower speeds it’s fairly realistic. I really enjoyed flying this plane :)

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 I don't know how to fix the maneuverability, but at least it makes it a hell of a dogfighter.

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    Just tested it and it’s pretty nice! It goes a bit too fast so I think 2-3 props per engine would be better. It looks very good but it’s also a little too manoeuvrable. The paint scheme could also be improved though slightly. Overall its a job well done!

    4.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 I did take inspiration from a british aircraft. Maybe it was a collaboration between them?

    4.9 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments