Profile image

Tank testing

7,525 plane918273645  5.8 years ago
9 downloads
Unlisted No Tags
Auto Credit Based on plane918273645's Tank

Testing-
Vtol-throttle
yaw-turn,
turret-pitch/roll
ag4-activate flares
keep this general idea in mind

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Tank
  • Successors 1 airplane(s)
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 11.1ft (3.4m)
  • Length 16.2ft (4.9m)
  • Height 6.7ft (2.0m)
  • Empty Weight 11,826lbs (5,364kg)
  • Loaded Weight 11,987lbs (5,437kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading 439,839.3lbs/ft2 (2,147,483.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 3586

Parts

  • Number of Parts 250
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 1,268
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    I know... you just said keep this idea in mind... just forget the part about it being amphibious... @plane918273645

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Yes but my tank is not amphibious. I just used that picture as an example My tank is not a replica @CustomAircraftMods

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    The one your tank in the picture of the real life tank is an amphibious tank... @plane918273645

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    That is just an I’mage of a tank that kind of looks like mine, sorry you guys got the idea that this was a replica @exosuit

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.2k exosuit

    @plane918273645 the image you're referencing is an AAV

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    I never said it was amphibious?@CustomAircraftMods

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    So keep this in mind... this is an amphibious tank... meaning it is probably thinly armored and armed to keep weight down.
    The turret seems a bit cramped for even a 2 man crew... not to mention a 3-man crew! The armament is perfect... however...I honestly think there should be more ammo. The suspension is also a little unrealistic. Look at older-type soviet tanks, and you can get some good ideas for suspension and wheel layouts. Their big road wheel design keeps them robust and able to cross all terrain! That’s all the criticism I’m gonna give. Noting much else bothers me.

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Currently my new plans are to up size the turret and it’s barrel, and also change up the back, muzzle break and armour plates @ChiyomiAnzai

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.3k Fumo

    @plane918273645
    Refer to exosuit's comment.

    Listing off the most noticeable problems first.
    - The AFV's turret is noticeably lacking in height, which is quite the flaw as it would prevent the gun from depressing.

    • The gun is too thick to be a 105mm, reduce the height and width. Lengthen the gun as well.

    • Gun lacks a bore evacuator.

    • Muzzle brake is too short

    • The hull is far too angled.

    • ERA isn't really needed for this vehicle as the armor is just aluminium.
      If detonated, it may do more harm than good.

    +1 5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.2k exosuit

    Huh
    .
    I found alot of problems
    .
    -First of all, the one on the picture is more of an Amphibious Assault Vehicle than a tank
    -It's lacking the drive sprocket and the return rollers
    -The turret is too flat, the gun can barely fit there
    -Try to join the upper and lower glacis into more of a point than just flat surface
    -It's lacking the driver's hatch
    -Too much slope on the side
    -It's lacking a form of APS launcher despite you added the radar for it
    -The gun barrel is too short and looks unproportional to the turret
    -Replace the muzzle break for smoothbore turret
    -Try to get the gun optics to the gun mantlet
    -No hatches or any sort of equipment which enables the crews to see the outside of the tank
    -No machine guns means you'll have a rough time dealing with infantries
    -I don't really like how the rear end goes. Too rough for me, you can make it alot smoother
    -Move the turret more to the forward, unless you're mounting the engine on the front, which isn't really ideal anyways
    -The ERA plates on the sides are too far spaced
    .
    Hope that helps

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Nerfaddict

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    In description I added a pic of what the details I hopefully want @metallicplanes

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @DaKraken

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @plane918273645 K.

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Hopefully anywhere between 400-700 parts depending on like how fast I can build and how it looks

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @plane918273645 ik. But it's cool already.

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Not done though @metallicplanes

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Looks: 10/10

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Wooh, that's hot.

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @metallicplanes

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Ok 250 parts

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @exosuit

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @USSR

    5.8 years ago

This post is unlisted and upvoting is disabled.