@K692 fair enough you are entitled to your views, this particular aircraft was more about taking a particular shape (a Pentagon) and making it fly hence the drag etc.

@AeroEngineering I leave the off piste stuff to others after all its not called 'Simple Fish', whilst I appreciate others creations, boats, robots, and motors etc tend to appear on the featured page a bit too often for my liking. My skin even starts to itch when I see a helicopter as we all know they are the devils work and really shouldn't fly.

I thought it would actually be a vtol Mackerel from the notification

@karlosdarkness Quoting another post : " Sorry but 3 stars is not supposed to be a bad rating. A 5 star rating has lost all of its meaning and is given way too easily. To me a 5 stars planes is really good looking (or an accurate replica) that flies perfectly and has practically no defect, or a really cool concept. A 4 stars has either one (either really good looking or flies really well). The 3 stars are not exceptional builds in any aspect but are still totally flyable. I don't want to disrespect the work you put in so a 3 stars rating will still give you points. The reason I rate this way is because it's hard to find really good planes when they all have 4-5 stars. Sorry if this offended you or whatever, I sincerely didn't meant to do this." Your plane is nice but there's a bit too much drag and I find it a bit imprevisible in how it handles

@K692 Why four stars? What would have improved it in your opinion?