JUNKERS G.38
Don't think it's bad that I haven't added a "full detail" interior and haven't made walk through wings if I did this would be incredibly laggy
FOR MOBULE USERS USE LOW SETTINGS- NO LAG
I built this plane about a month ago but it was tiny....so I may have enlarged it
FEATURES
four gigantic engines
Four gigantic wheels
Two mostorusly large wings
3000 gallons of fuel
Seats for all :)
Mobile friendly (yay)
Easy to land
40,000ibs weight (because I can)
WHAT NOT TO EXPECT
Good climb rate
Good agility
Huge wings with seats in them (that will come later in the non mobile friendly one that I can't play D; )
NOTE TO PILOTS..
Rolling decreases altitude and it has a terrible climb rate so no banking at under 1000ft instead use rudder and lots of pitch :)
The gears move in air... If they move like this. /
Land with the rear main landing gear wheels first
If like this \ use the tail wheel to touch doen first
ABOUT THE PLANE
it was a four engines german transport plane and airliner
It could carry 41 people (including crew) and was ten biggest land based plane of its time (the largest plane being the DORNIER DO X that I also made a month ago) it was later licenced for production in Japan under misubishi and was named the ki20 that was used as a Bomber and military transport plane. The construction used the standard Junkers metal sheeting that was used at the time.
CREW:7
PASSENGERS:34
Empty weight:32,000ibs
Loaded weight:52,000ibs
INNER ENGINES: 2x junkers l55 water cooled V12
OUTER ENGINES: 2x junkers l8a water cooled in line 6
MAX SPEED: 140mph
RANGE: 2,150 miles
ENJOY YOUR VERY OWN AIRLINER :)
PS: just noticed that when It crashed when I uploaded first time it got rid of a save so there is an ugly black line behind the left outer engine all OCD ppl out there to save your annoyance paint it the same coulor from the other side...........
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 191.7ft (58.4m)
- Length 86.0ft (26.2m)
- Height 19.9ft (6.1m)
- Empty Weight 17,151lbs (7,780kg)
- Loaded Weight 47,740lbs (21,654kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.282
- Wing Loading 8.2lbs/ft2 (40.2kg/m2)
- Wing Area 5,802.7ft2 (539.1m2)
- Drag Points 18507
Parts
- Number of Parts 475
- Control Surfaces 7
- Performance Cost 1,895
Comments
- Log in to leave a comment
-
307 Mistermann124In my book, this plane is a five star rating without testing (after the rating I will PHLY it)9.3 years ago
-
13.8k TheSoundofLight@PlanesOfOld @corey1324 is actually right, the wings are high wing. Not low wing.9.4 years ago
-
731 BlazeLike a few days9.4 years ago
-
731 Blaze@PlanesOfOld uhhh...I could possibly do it on pc but I would have to be in America to do that and I don't think it would be mobile friendly :/ ... Sadly9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOldPut the wngs on........ It's too big 4 me@Blaze9.4 years ago
-
731 Blaze@PlanesOfOld you asked me to do something to this plane?...9.4 years ago
-
731 Blaze@PlanesOfOld is this it?9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOldSo if he spent days I would have expected more @TheSoundofLight9.4 years ago
-
13.8k TheSoundofLight@PlanesOfOld read his reply on the Lancaster it says"I spent days on this why so critical?" Yeah, he spent DAYS.9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOld@TheSoundofLight OMG READ THE COMMENT! HIS RATING JS A RETALIATION BECAUSE I DOWNRATED HIS AVRO LANCASTER BECAUSE IT DOSNT LOOK LIKE ONE HE COPY PASTED WHAT I SAID AND PUT UT IN HIS RATING9.4 years ago
-
13.8k TheSoundofLight@PlanesOfOld it was not a retaliation because 1 it wasn't a rating and 2 because he is right9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOldThat is a retaliation rating because I diwnrated his Lancaster because it didn't look like on at all he just copy pasted what I put on his plane @TheSoundofLight9.4 years ago
-
13.8k TheSoundofLightI agree with @corey13249.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOld@Blaze ..........9.4 years ago
-
13.8k TheSoundofLightWay to big to run on my ipad9.4 years ago
-
648 DailyCrashThese five stars for the most real landing gears! This is the first G.38 i saw.9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOld@cirey1324 what? Your Lancasters wings were completely wrong and so was the tail the body was way too stumpy and the front bombardiers cabin was shaped wrong!9.4 years ago
-
2,838 corey1324I Give 4 stars for the effort but take away one because you have obviously not seen a Junkers G.389.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOldLol @TheOwlAce9.4 years ago
-
32.4k TheAceOwl@PlanesOfOld Oh awesome! I was thinking of building this plane and had tried to build a experimental plane that had a all block wing with normal controls. It couldn't take off.9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOld@TheOwlAce Nope we have a family friend who is related to junkers so I have known about their aircraft for a long long time and this has been my favorite I just stumbled upon my old build that tried to replicate tjis and I thought why not?9.4 years ago
-
32.4k TheAceOwlYou got this idea from "the wind rises" didn't you?9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOld@Shmexysmpilot Ue the roll to get at least two years on the ground at a time!9.4 years ago
-
8,104 LofiTurtleHow do you land if the left gear is like / and the right gear goes like \ D:9.4 years ago
-
1,248 BluCant wait for those in wing windows9.4 years ago
- Log in to see more comments