WWll didn't catch M.Corp unprepared. Although a bit obsolete by then, it could still outmaneuver Me109. I slacked a bit on its fix landing gear, but the rest of the plane is up to stand. I hope you will enjoy it, and if you do, don't forget to upvote.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Successors 2 airplane(s)
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 54.9ft (16.7m)
- Length 46.6ft (14.2m)
- Height 17.0ft (5.2m)
- Empty Weight 4,530lbs (2,055kg)
- Loaded Weight 26,839lbs (12,174kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.125
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.074
- Wing Loading 18.7lbs/ft2 (91.3kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,435.9ft2 (133.4m2)
- Drag Points 6195
Parts
- Number of Parts 122
- Control Surfaces 16
- Performance Cost 479
@Glaceon lol
@EternalDarkness Kay *Exits through door* btw I finished flipping the table
@Glaceon GET OUT!
@EternalDarkness Very sorry for the massive waste of space.
@Oicraftian I never meant to insult Bf109, as I too like that old plane. As I have mentioned in the reply to your first comment, I have based the description upon Rogožarski Ik3, that could easily outmaneuver older Bf109s although it was significantly slower.
@Oicraftian
1. Get a sense of humour, It's an obvious joke
2. Stop kicking the dead horse in your back yard.
3. If I didn't know basic physics my planes wouldn't fly.
4. Stop talking about yourself.
@Glaceon
1 Shut up. This is over.
2 Shut up racist.
3 Learn basic physics.
4 Use your one functioning brain cell
@Oicraftian B-17 turns better than the Bf 109. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@Glaceon says the dead horse.
@EternalDarkness of course, my apologies, I hope I didn't come off as too rude, I was just a bit... Nicked perhaps that you... dared state that you could outmaneuver my favorite aircraft of WW2... continues gushing over Bf-109
@Glaceon @Oicraftian guys, would you please stop arguing? I don't care who started it and why, I'm annoyed by notifications about your argument on my post. If you PM each other on reddit, you can even curse at each other, you know. Much better way to do this.
@Oicraftian You're beating a dead horse at this point.
@Glaceon Do you have anything else to say racist? Or are you surprised that I would correct someone on the topic on one of my favorite aircraft?
@Oicraftian It's a fictional plane, go criticize an actual plane.
Says the racist no? @Glaceon
Right, right, Okay. @EternalDarkness
@Oicraftian Dude, the hell is your problem?
@Oicraftian dude, you are spewing technicalities over a fictional plane. It's made to look good, not to really fight Messershmits. It would probably have different performances in real life, due to different materials being used, and the fact that then it would be designed by engineers.
@MaleticAirplanes Right, I know it's fictional but due to it's inferior p/w ratio and low wing loading it is rather likely to be defeated in a dogfight
@Oicraftian this plane is fictional, and so is its history. The main inspiration for the history was Rogožarski Ik3, that was slower, but much more maneuverable than Bf109.
Outmaneuver? Depends, Bf 109 F series more likely than not would outmaneuver you. Generally the Bf 109 series also has better energy retention, so in an energy fight...
If under "MA82 WAR HAWK" your name wasn't written, I would say that dat beauty was HIJACKED!!
@AndrewGarrison thank you
@MaleticAirplanes You have some really beautiful planes!
Thanks @AndrewGarrison . I don't remember having your upvotes on any other of my creations.
@mattmck finally someone gets it
@Cedy117 thanks