Profile image

Fairey Spearfish

53.2k Tang0five  5.8 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Tang0five's Dive Bomber Challenge Fairey Spearfish

My original Spearfish was a little lack lustre and I think the types rather underrepresented on this site so I thought a remake was in order.

The Fairey Spearfish was designed as a torpedo dive-bomber to replace the Barracuda operated by the Fleet Air Arm. She was considerably larger than the Barracuda having a more powerful engine and an internal weapons bay complete with retractable radar. The bulky Spearfish was to be at home on the planned 45,000 ton Malta-Class aircraft carriers however the carriers were cancelled amidst changing requirements during the Second World War.

With the big decks to house the Spearfish never materialising the programme was itself scrapped after 5 aircraft had been built. Of these 4 were flying being mostly used for experimental purposes. The last of the prototypes were finally scrapped in 1952.

The Spearfish was a big ungainly bird. So much so early flights had the test pilot stating “lateral control was so solid that I could barely move the ailerons with one hand at 130 knots.” This resulted in a hydraulic system being installed as an interim measure with equally unfavourable results.

Stall characteristics were another alarming ‘blip’ on the road to development. According to test pilots there was no indication the aircraft was going to enter a stall until you were in it. Coupled with this the approach speed to a carrier was also disturbingly close to stall point.

Controls

1 Flaps
2 Tail Hook
8 Lights

Internal weapons bay - lacking.
Folding wings as per naval practice - no documents/pictures I could find would suggest the prototype had foldable wings. I’m sure if production went ahead this would have featured. Besides, the flap mechanism is easily interrupted and I didn’t want to over complicate the structure in the wings.

Well I’ll stick some pics below and wish you all a happy new year!

General Characteristics

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.166
  • Wing Loading 16.4lbs/ft2 (80.2kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 731.2ft2 (67.9m2)
  • Drag Points 8184

Parts

  • Number of Parts 174
  • Control Surfaces 4
  • Performance Cost 774
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    Of course! @Nickr

    5.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,763 thecrusader

    @Tang0five I made a barracuda out of this is that okay

    5.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    Props and roundels old boy as you said a while ago, winning combo! @GhostHTX

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.5k GhostHTX

    Very cool. Very, very cool.

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    Thanks man glad you think so! @papermanplane
    @Texasfam04 and @mikoyanster cheers lads!

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    This aircraft is beautiful. ☺😀

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    @SledDriver @BogdanX @Treadmill103 @SarcasticCommander @RamboJutter thank you all!

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    @aplayer and @Serkonda thanks gents!

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    Thanks once again buddy! @Trainzo

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    42.7k Trainzo

    Very nice plane . Great job .

    5.8 years ago