Profile image

Vickers Type 161

30.4k Hyattorama  6.2 years ago

CLICK HERE FOR UPDATED VERSION

I like this plane but I don’t know about this build. Feels like there’s something off (besides that it’s an odd plane) or something’s missing (despite the 750+ part count). Oh well. You guys can be the judge.

The Vickers Type 161 was an unusual 1930s pusher biplane interceptor, designed to attack aircraft from below with a single upward-angle large calibre gun. The aircraft flew well but the concept was abandoned and only one was built.

Flight controls standard.
No AG controls.

Happy flying! :)

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 32.0ft (9.8m)
  • Length 27.3ft (8.3m)
  • Height 12.5ft (3.8m)
  • Empty Weight 3,141lbs (1,424kg)
  • Loaded Weight 4,124lbs (1,870kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.242
  • Wing Loading 4.6lbs/ft2 (22.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 891.2ft2 (82.8m2)
  • Drag Points 2469

Parts

  • Number of Parts 760
  • Control Surfaces 6
  • Performance Cost 2,399
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Yes I think that’s right. @ThePrototype

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.4k ThePrototype

    Yes, I used to have a pic of this. If I'm correct they fitted a 37mm cannon? @Hyattorama

    +1 6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Do you like it? Haha @ThePrototype

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.4k ThePrototype

    I just now found this

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Haha yup. Letters are hard @Mustang51

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    I completely understand that hahahaha. I made the letter H once and I’m gonna use it as much as I can instead of making new ones hahahaha @Hyattorama

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Thanks buddy!! Yeah it’s super rare considering they only made 1. I think the call letters on that one were J 9566 or something. But I put J 999 cause it fit better and was easier to do haha (I’m not too good with liveries but I’m working on it... slowly...)@Mustang51

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    Wow this is a fantastic replica of what I would say is a relatively rare plane. The detail is absolutely stunning!

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Got it. Awesome! Thank you! @Chancey21

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    Is there a space between the brackets and the parentheses? They have to be right after each other @Hyattorama

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    ...still not working...? @Chancey21

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    Brackets around the clicky, parentheses around the www. Link @Hyattorama

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    @Chancey21 I guess I did something wrong, the link is just plain text....

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Hyattorama Always willing to help whenever I can :)

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Ok, thanks for the feedback. I think I will post an update later. Hey, would you do me a favor and take another look at the suspension? I think the geometry is off, cause the spring strength is only 10% and it’s still too stiff, like you said. Only I don’t know how to fix it... @Chancey21

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Yeah I’m pretty happy with my SP experience on iPhone 7. @JelloAircraftCorporation @Carbonfox1

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Haha I know it’s weird but that’s how the real plane was made. And yeah, I forgot to disable collisions on the prop. Oops... I might post an update with that and some other changes. Anyway thanks! :) @GenericWhiteGuy

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Thank you sir!! @Trainzo

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Hahaha well that’s why I said I struggle with part count. Meaning I’m not good at keeping the part count low. @Carbonfox1

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    156k MAHADI

    AWESOME! Cool wing designing! I think there was a gun with the same name...

    6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    Good, wing loading is better
    Things to improve:
    Suspension is too strong
    Top speed should be 185 MPH not 230
    Engine should be 530 HP instead of 1000
    Loaded weight should be 3000 and empty weight should be 2500
    Lower the drag to make it reach 185MPH with the 500 HP engine

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    I can run 1500+ part builds on my iphone 7. So that could be an option instead of a pc @Carbonfox1

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    This is really cool. I'm not that into planes and haven't seen that kind of prop placement, which is pretty neat imo. Although the prop seems to tend to kill itself when I pitch too hard. I fixed it by simply disabling aircraft collisions on the propeller. And not sure about that gun/cannon angle. I ain't a great enough pilot to down someone with this complexity :D Great build nonetheless. Love this!
    It truly is a shame that I can't spotlight your stuff.
    Take care.

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    43.3k Trainzo

    A great plane and a great job again .

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,910 Liquidfox01

    @Hyattorama coming from the user who made a 700 part plane! lmao

    +1 6.2 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments