Profile image

ME109 vs SPIT by SR

328k SpiritusRaptor  9.2 years ago

FINAL

Well, as it turns out the ME109 performs better than the Spitfire (not my doing).

So in flight, slow down the ME109 to chase the Spitfire, or take off with the ME109 prop. pitch turned all the way down (VTOL up) for the Spitfire to dogfight the ME109 (either way, need to slow down the German plane as speeding up the UK plane is not so effective).

Activation 1 for ME109 controls.
Activation 2 for Spitfire controls.
Activation 3 and 4 for prop. pitch (respectively).
Activations 5 and 6 to laucnh rocktes.

(Note - difficult for formation flying with different wing configurations, this is purely hunt and kill!)

Good hunting!
By SR.

General Characteristics

  • Successors 4 airplane(s) +14 bonus
  • Created On Mac
  • Wingspan 116.9ft (35.6m)
  • Length 38.0ft (11.6m)
  • Height 16.2ft (4.9m)
  • Empty Weight 771lbs (350kg)
  • Loaded Weight 773lbs (350kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading N/A
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 151

Parts

  • Number of Parts 5
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 761
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @MustangPilot I have, they are looking great! it takes time to get into this but worth keeping at it!

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SpiritusRaptor could you check out some of my planes. Mine are inspired by your technique.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MustangPilot Thanks

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Great Aircraft Designs. I Like To Capitalize Everyrhing I Say.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @kukimuki1234 Thats right, they are controlled by rotators VTOL which you can turn one plane on and one plane off, or have both on etc.

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.3k kukimuki1234

    9/10 they dont have any control surfaces

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Hahaha! Very good... @Maxo04

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    10/10!
    I got the ME to fly straight, and i got a lucky shot with the Spitfire, and took it down. It was amazing.

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SpiritusRaptor yeah, I was being literal.

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Eactly, and size similar to my subsea explorer @Kegger0101

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    But not a serious question right @2Spooky4Me

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SpiritusRaptor just asking.

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Sure. I'll work on the chassis. Would it be something that is fast, flexible, but lightweight? Or stiff but can handle more weight @SpiritusRaptor

    9.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @2Spooky4Me Why do you say?

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    So you make a living off making planes or what?

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Good idea - how anout the chasis and wheels - did you want to yake that on? I have a large missile already and launcher @Kegger0101

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SpiritusRaptor that would be really cool! maybe if you set up an antenna (like your underwater explorer) you could have a camera like a periscope for the launcher.

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    How about a missile launcher on wheels that can go underwater and/or foat? @Kegger0101

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Would you possibly be able to do a collaboration with me? I wanted to make a boat or amphibious vehicle of sorts.

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Kegger0101 HI, sure?

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Hey Spiritus. i have a question

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    I would assume Bf-109, just used caps for convenience at the time!@SpiritusRaptor

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @WWIIPlaneBuilder ok then , BF109... or is it Bf109...

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Thank you @PhilipTarpley

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Really cool. They both fly great.

    9.2 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments