Focke-Wulf fw190 A
4,487 luzernsaphir
8.2 years ago
My first try to build a replica.Im having fun as i add more details to this plane and getting pround of it.Suggestions and comments welcomed!
Specifications
Spotlights
- This craft has been featured
- JaySto 8.2 years ago
- jamesPLANESii 8.2 years ago
- goboygo1 8.2 years ago
- TinyToucan 8.2 years ago
- GT3TobyRS 8.2 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 2 airplane(s) +7 bonus
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 33.8ft (10.3m)
- Length 26.9ft (8.2m)
- Height 11.4ft (3.5m)
- Empty Weight 5,309lbs (2,408kg)
- Loaded Weight 6,965lbs (3,159kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.287
- Wing Loading 19.2lbs/ft2 (93.8kg/m2)
- Wing Area 362.7ft2 (33.7m2)
- Drag Points 2087
Parts
- Number of Parts 79
- Control Surfaces 8
- Performance Cost 358
@baltar the roll rate can be achieve if you load more fuel near the tail,in this way you make the plane more unstable.the reall 190 is indeed a unstable plane,but i think it's not very fun to fly such a thing in a game full of overpowered ufos.thanks for your suggests!
Superb replica! My only wish would be for a better roll rate--the fw 190 was noted for its exceptional roll rate.
Mate. Is something up? @kukimuki1234
Luzern, I posted the preliminary Zero already, would you like to check it out?
Also, I can't find a single thing offensive with your post. You don't have to apologize. @luzernsaphir
Panels aren't mobile friendly? Since when? Question, have you evaluated the results of such as usage on my aircraft? They can run smoothly on Ipad 2nd Gen and that is usually my benchmark for "it can run just fine" @VladCelTroll
@VladCelTroll lol,that won't happens.It's very kind of you to help with my problem.There are many things i'm trying to understand in this game.
@VladCelTroll well,i didn't mean to be offensive.My english is poor,that i may seems impolite.:).btw,i look through all your plane,can you tell me what is more important to you?Good-looking or good flight performance?I find it hard to have a balance between them.
@kukimuki1234 uh...you can have a look at my first two posts,they would convice you. when i compare my own P38 with others,i decide to skill up,now i'm still a inexperience player but im trying to do better.thanks for you comments.
@luzernsaphir i dont believe that you are new user,you are old user with new account
@kukimuki1234 why i can't build a replica even i just join the game only 3days?what is improtant is learning.
@VladCelTroll he maybe isnt new player,he is probably old player with a new account
@VladCelTroll You are my favorite simpleplanes player,and i dont wanna to yell at you,but now i must
THIS ISNT 1000 PART PLANE
@VladCelTroll but this one is featured when he was having 26 points
A hidden work of genius! Takes a while to get the hang of it but it's great work!
@WeeBabySeamus BUT WHY
Actually wait. I'll just post a temporary mod to mess around with wing lift values and the problem should be solved.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/DK2D01/Focke-Wolf-190-A
Yea, it had to do with the set lift numbers you were using.
@luzernsaphir
@Oicraftian yeah,the arbitrary problem is what i mean.do u have any idea to fix it?the problem really bothers me.u can feel free to keep ur nitpicking and edit my plane lol.
The balance thing is somewhat arbitrary, it's just how it slowly angles downwards whilst flying
I meant structural panels and not fuselage. I don't use fuselage because of lag and how difficult it is to make it work right.
Don't worry about my nitpicking. If my nitpicking takes less than a page in word at font 11 it should be taken as a compliment unless I explicitly state otherwise. @luzernsaphir
@Oicraftian and i still don't realize what cause the balance problem.seems like the weight center,lift center the power center are all at a good place.is it the plane just too heavy and got a low power/weight ratio?
@Oicraftian yeah after i finish the plane i realize that i can use fuselage to make a more correct wing.as a new player im keeping learning from my every work and other player'planes xd.
Nice work!
I'll toss in my up vote right after this post :D
But~ it's balance isn't all that great, the dual wings cause flight problems, and some parts don't look quite as smooth as they can be and that's pretty much it
For an example, if it I were permitted to modify the aircraft and repost it (with complete permissions to you and a request all up votes be redirected towards you) I would use the fuselage to overlap the cockpit. Maybe use some panels to try and replicate the angled canopy. I would also have not used "wings" for the wing thickness, instead I would use a series of panel pieces to give a 3D look to it, which is more mobile friendly and easier to balance.
Which ties into something else, it doesn't fly all that great unfortunately. It has a pretty heavy lean forward and requires you to constantly trim the aircraft to keep the nose level.
But aside from that everything else is great! :D
If you would like to see what I exactly mean in live examples... Well my Zeroes are "somewhat" close... Yeah I need to work on them
@kukimuki1234 Keep up the harassment and all you will get from me is a ban.
I'll concede: It's very good for a first-try replica, yes, but it's not as good as the things you usually see on the "Featured" page
@GoeringsWorkshop (there are some blind peoples)
why is this featured?
I have tried but failed to make FW190 (translated by Google)but I made a BF109 OvO HERE!!! https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/rOlw3d/BF-109-E-X