Profile image

Lockheed P-38 Lightning

439 swagmaster32  9.3 years ago
36 downloads
No Tags

Hey,guys I'm back(I'm sure nobody cares) with a new and improved version of the Lockheed p-38 lightning have fun

General Characteristics

  • Successors 1 airplane(s) +7 bonus
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 37.5ft (11.4m)
  • Length 23.0ft (7.0m)
  • Height 9.0ft (2.8m)
  • Empty Weight 5,726lbs (2,597kg)
  • Loaded Weight 7,124lbs (3,231kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.631
  • Wing Loading 41.4lbs/ft2 (202.0kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 172.2ft2 (16.0m2)
  • Drag Points 2007

Parts

  • Number of Parts 58
  • Control Surfaces 9
  • Performance Cost 279
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @Meawk Okay maybe I'll add those then.And also you said "pretty much nothing else :/"well let's see I'm going to make a list of the things I did get right:the name the props the cockpit the front landing gear the back panel the witnesses and the wing shape look a an image bro :/ Btw THANK YOU so much for the suggestions they are highly appreciated (not sarcasm

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,797 Meawk

    @swagmaster32 yes, but there were still 2 intakes on the back. and btw i got all this from the top of my head. I just checked and u were right about the inlets but pretty much nothing else :/

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    The real plane has intake on bottom of the propeller

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Meawk yeah I'm limited with number of props bro and I saw the wheel on the front but I thought it wouldn't work and it actually did have turboprop

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,797 Meawk

    @swagmaster32 wings r wrong, they look like they r angled on the plane but they r not. There are also no turbo intakes farther back on the fuselage, It didn't use turboprops, only had 3 blades (i might be wrong about the blade count this is off the top of my head) and you are also missing the 3rd landing gear on the nose. I like the tail tho.

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Meawk Explain? Then I can improve because I think im pretty spot on!

    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,797 Meawk

    not accurate but still pretty awesome!

    9.3 years ago