Lore. The F-15 Eagle ACI is a license-built version of the F-15, made Because Ac-industries wanted a Multi-Role Fighter designed to be just under Project X in terms of performance and power, but a few of them together capable of downing Project X.
Gallery Pt 1
Weaponry.
6x ACIAIM-2's
2x ACIAGM-1's
2x ACIGAU-1's (note these are my first attempt at making guided bombs they are not the greatest)
2x Weapon pods, these carry separately
2x guardians
60x Micro AAM's
2x machine guns
4x Boom 25's
Gallery Pt 2
Controls
Ag1 Drop all weapons
Ag2 Thrust vectoring
Ag3 Parachute
Ag4 Master arm
Ag7 Canopy
VR Controls
The buttons Between the screens and gauges are the ones to pay attention to for Ag's they are in white in the photo
Note, to anyone who visits this, this is the prototype description, I accidently put this here after I finished the final one
Specifications
Spotlights
- TheUltimatePlaneLover 3 months ago
- windshifter1 3 months ago
- TheMouse 3 months ago
- Majakalona 3 months ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor F-15 ACI
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 38.8ft (11.8m)
- Length 61.5ft (18.8m)
- Height 17.3ft (5.3m)
- Empty Weight 14,228lbs (6,453kg)
- Loaded Weight 33,258lbs (15,085kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 20.291
- Wing Loading 70.1lbs/ft2 (342.1kg/m2)
- Wing Area 474.6ft2 (44.1m2)
- Drag Points 11332
Parts
- Number of Parts 711
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 4,346
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries thanks
Damn, this post's comment got some WW3 in it ☠️
Congrats bro 🔥🔥 (i know im late)
@SPsidearm and you do not get
me wan
@crazyplaness oh
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I don’t mean fly smooth I mean run smooth as in good fps
@crazyplaness fair, this doesn’t fly that well
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Sorry but the performance cost is just a little too high. The plane must run smoothly and unfortunately it doesn’t
@crazyplaness Can you curate this
@Randomplayer it should be pretty easy, just use a fuselage for the small part and another for the larger ontop.
@Kenzar 22 days ago but the f4 phantoms tail is weirdly hard to make :/
@Kenzar I'm planning on updating it later
realism being not my old aircraft... the 3 newest props are really my only good aircraft
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fair enough, it could use a little work (primarily with optimisation) but i can help you with that. and for the me not making replicas, id argue that fictional realism takes more skill than replicas
@Kenzar Well for my gold special I wanted to make a plane that I really like so I picked the F-15
but honestly, if you did use a blueprint, i dont blame you. the F15 is complicated and it might be better to practice on some more simple aircraft. maybe give the F16 or F4 a try? maybe a MiG-19 or 15 could be good aswell.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 wings are too small. engines are too small. nose shaped weirdly. vert stabilisers too thick. canopy shaped wrong. inlets shaped wrong. body too small. wings too thick. airbrake wrong shape. control surfaces too large. fusialge to thin.
@Kenzar I do not know what you are on, because that looks like an f-15, and I don't want to hear to from the person, who hasn't built a replica since they were new
im not saying its bad, but 700 parts is just way too many. 20:1 twr and 11 thousand drag points is just bad. you did not use a blueprint, and if it turns out you did, you followed it horribly.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 its pretty obvious you did not use a blueprint, and wow, you really needed 400 parts for something you coulve done with 50?
@Kenzar Let's see, well first we got the 120 mini-AAms ,each ACIAIM-2 is 17 each ACIAGM-1 is 21 and each ACIGAU is 17
@Kenzar and I legitimately do not know why you think I didn't use a blueprint, it looks like an F-15
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 400 parts for missiles??? god what part inefficiency are you up to
@Kenzar 700 is because of the missiles and stuff, if you take that away, it's 300
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 theres also no way you used a blueprint.. and 700 parts for this? and 20:1 twr is just not...