Yak-1 Soviet hero
31.2k pavthepilot
7.1 years ago
Auto Credit Based on pavthepilot's Yak-1 Soviet hero
this is the amazing yak 1 from warwings ! The weight is a bit innacuarate but it flies like a dream! Have fun!
Specifications
Spotlights
- EpicPigster1 7.1 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Yak-1 Soviet hero
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 31.9ft (9.7m)
- Length 27.2ft (8.3m)
- Height 11.1ft (3.4m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 820lbs (372kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 3.656
- Wing Loading 3.7lbs/ft2 (18.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 222.6ft2 (20.7m2)
- Drag Points 2873
Parts
- Number of Parts 95
- Control Surfaces 7
- Performance Cost 428
Thanks@Tang0five
LOL typo while trying to correct someone. XD @F4f879
Actually it's "inaccurate" @Awsomur
Thanks @F4f879
@MrDoolittle I know but have no reason to post planes anymore
@pavthepilot that's dumb
@MrDoolittle that no more matters , it told that I stopped playing
Stop whining about not getting upvotes, I made this in two days too and if you just put more effort into making the plane look right you would get more.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/kQNKMe/F4U-Corsair
Honestly tho just fucking play the game. I was a silver for most of my two years on this site and you don't hear me complaining. It makes me happier actually to feel I earned gold because my planes got better over the nearly two years as silver unlike some people who just got handed their rank.
@CoolPeach I will post something only if I had fun building it
Ugh, your absolutely too obsessed over upvotes. Play the game for fun, not for some counter on your build. Whether it's fair, well no, but life is never fair. @pavthepilot
He has 84 followers, you have 35, he has a bigger audience that's all. @pavthepilot
@CoolPeach bit can you tell me why that canyon runner (his )last plane post has more upvotes than my plane?
They're not better nor worse because they're not the same.
What your asking me to do is to tell me which ones a better, TV or pasta, two completely unrelated topics
@pavthepilot
Well, you asked for it.
I will now dissect your plane:
1.) Defult cockpit is a no no. They just look bad, really easy to make a fusalage cockpit too, better shape ect.
2.) Fusalage shape is clucky and wrong. The real fusalage follows back behind the cockpit (unless it's the Yak 1b), it's smooth too, unlike this. This shouldn't be hard to do, especially with being able to type sizes in.
3.) Tail, it's just not good. Try to use fusalage to make a smoother vertical stab and horizontal stab, they really not very nice right now
4.) Landing gear, it's not correct. WW2 planes have singular wheeled landing gear, with resizable wheels this shouldn't be hard. Plus with the parts transform tool, why didn't you nudge it into the wing so it looked connected. Also wheels are generally black not white.
5.) The wings. While the shaping might be alright, I highly encourage you to expose the ailerons, I personally know of people who despise hidden ailerons.
6.) Extras: Fusalage is generally too thin. Wings lack the correct dihedral. Proportions are a bit off.
If you think that was harsh, I'm sorry, but whining wasn't gonna do anything so I gave to you straight up, no sugar coating.
We all start bad, it's just how we go about getting better. Time is of the essence!
@pavthepilot
Really? What about this or this? @pavthepilot
@Awsomur you re always successful.
@CoolPeach yeah I want
I understand how it is. I’m not always successful! But you don’t see me complaining about it! @pavthepilot
Well it seems like you care about the upvotes heh?
Well @pavthepilot, do you want advice?
@Awsomur I would appreciate if you would understand how spending two days on a plane and not being appreciated is
I would appreciate it if you’d stop whining. @pavthepilot
@Awsomur the other ones are cool but the canyon diver
, I can build that in 15 minutes
Yes, every one of them. @pavthepilot
@Awsomur I was talking about the canyon diver
@Awsomur the canyon diver?