@Zott Bayerische Flugzeugwerke Bf-109

@Aeromen The name was wrong. I'm sorry. Thanks for your Upvote.(^o^)

@NovianAlif198
@mikoyanster
@Carbonfox1
@marcox43
@Feanor
@TheFantasticTyphoon
@yoshicraze
@RicardoAs1515
Thx! All. (^o^)

@ChiChiWerx Thank you as always! (^o^)

Also, remove some weight? This thing is already underweight as compared to the real thing, which was around 7,500 lbs, so I wouldn’t do that either. Plus the wing loading is a lot less than it would be in RL...the Bf-109 has a wing loading around 40 lbs/sq ft. I also didn’t have any trouble with shooting off my nose, though I have seen this is hit or miss depending on the user, so might be a random issue.

I don’t think the maneuverability is bad/unrealistic. The fix @Aeromen proposes is the fix for when the airplane flips over end over end when the CoG and CoM are too close. This isn’t the issue here. The issue here is the airplane is entering an accelerated stall when the pilot pulls back to hard, so there’s an excessive amount of pitch authority. Though in SP, this isn’t modeled perfectly, it still produces a semi realistic effect in that the airplane snap rolls over if the pilot pulls too hard on the stick. In real life, especially in a fighter, I would fix this by warning the pilots not to pull too hard and avoid the high speed stall...which is actually a RL thing for many aircraft. It flies fine, maneuverability isn’t “bad”, in fact it’s very good and a skilled pilot can exploit this maneuverability while avoiding the stall, so, nah, I wouldn’t change a thing but for a mention in the flight manual.

@SodiumChloride
@JohnnyBoythePilot
@NovianAlif198
@otayahiromo8211
@AceOfSpade
@Aeroman
Thx! All (^o^)

@Stgk Thx! Your reaction is fast. lol