Profile image

Peace Walker XB-75

6,616 Shootingstar07  6.0 years ago

History

In 1970's.As the interceptor and missile technology advances, it closes the possibility of high speed high altitude assault.After the powerful but useless XB-70. The USAF start the HSB(heavy strategic bomber)program for a new generation bombers that fit the role of low-altitude penetration. And one of the model submitted is the PeaceWalker model 28,later given the name XB-75. Although it is the early explorer for low-alt assault, it still keep many features of its predecessor.The wing is one special feature of the aircraft.Unlike other variable geometry wing aircraft,the moving part of the wing will rest on the upper surface of the fixed part.Although it meets all the requirements, the program is halted as the US military reform.And the only one phototype is produce.The later new program finally lead to the B1B lancer.

User manal

Normal flight controls
(But please remember to let all the control surface go back to neutral before operating the VG mechanism)
VTOL UP for afterburner
AG5 for lights
AG6 for activate the baydoor and payload
AG7 for actuvate the VG mechanism
Trim is need to achieve level flight.The aircraft is nose heavy when fully loaded,and it will be more balance after dropping all the democracy to the 'bad guys'.Also afterburner will give a nose up force to the aircraft.

Specifications :

Length:30.9m
Wingspan:
Smallest wing swept angle:25.6m
Largest wing swept angle:15.3m
Height:8.2m
Empty weight:36994kg
Loaded weight:47273kg
Powerplant:2×BFE450turbofan engine,maximum thrust 450kN
Combat celling:18000m
Maximum speed:
1094kmh(300m)
1915kmh(10000m)
Payload:36×500prond bomb

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 84.0ft (25.6m)
  • Length 101.4ft (30.9m)
  • Height 26.9ft (8.2m)
  • Empty Weight 81,559lbs (36,994kg)
  • Loaded Weight 104,219lbs (47,273kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.94
  • Wing Loading 59.1lbs/ft2 (288.3kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,764.8ft2 (164.0m2)
  • Drag Points 28669

Parts

  • Number of Parts 390
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 2,315
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @LegnaK ok...I got it.And sorry for forgotting to tell you about turning on the afterburner,that will make flying with VG activated much easier!

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.6k LegnaK

    @Shootingstar07 yeah that was the half point docker and what really confused me, in the screenshot it was really good, but in PC flight it was super reflective,

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LegnaK And I ask some of my friends.They said the white is really super reflective on PC.May be this is the reason?...Because as you see on the screenshot.The white isn't very reflective on the mobile

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LegnaK As for the colours...I want it to resemble that "radiation proof white"for the cold war aircraft as one of the "features from its predcessors".Maybe I haven't done enough res earch before making the colour scheme,sorry for that

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LegnaK Thanks a lot for spending your time on judging my craft!
    For the nose dive problem...it is because of the center of lift moving rearward signifiantly.My personal solution is to turn up the afterburner.But not everyone likes to do that.So I admit this is a very big fault of this craft.
    Again,thanks for taking time giving comment and testing my aircraft!

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.6k LegnaK

    .

    Handling, stability, agility: 8/10 - the aircraft handles very well, however when the wings are swept in, there is little to no mobility with the aircraft, and even with trim as high as it can, the Peace Walker XB-75 still nose dives to where its a constant fight with the aircraft, although, this may be pilot error, please feel free to correct me on this.
    
    Realistic model and behavior: 8/10 - aside from the very unresponsive controls when ag7 is in motion, the bomber acts like a bomber should, the design seems very plausable and makes me sad something like this doesn't exist.
    
    Details, paint and other: 9.5/10 - almost everything about this plane is perfect, the paneling, the markings... although, the very reflective white(which would be super noticable) and the lack of roundels do unfortunate take a tiny toll on the crafts overall score.
    
    Build quality: 11/10 - amazing design, and impressive output, I have to say this aircraft was definetly well thought out and executed nicely. and extra point has been added due to the addition of a functioning cockpit view.
    
    Personal impression: 10/10 -this was a very nice and unique aircraft, I was intrigued with its design and was very pleased with how it operated.
    
    Description: 9.5/10 - A very nicely done history, however abeit a little short. 
    

    final score: 56/60

    +1 5.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LegnaK thank you!

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.6k LegnaK

    @Shootingstar07 absolutely!

    +1 6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LegnaK so...can I still enter the challenge?

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Blue0Bull This design is loosely base on the Fokker-republic D-24.

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k soundwave

    f l a t

    6.0 years ago