No Tags
Named in reference to the airframe from which it originated . As the name says. I didnsome research between this and the most recent of my P-51 models. By comparing them, i found greater speed in this plane, slightly reduced weight, and as a result of both of these, increased fuel efficiency. Stability is slightly decreased, which is exibhited by the minute fishtailing that occurs after a sharp roll. Quite frankly, I find this to be more appealing visually than my mustang.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 27.6ft (8.4m)
- Length 23.0ft (7.0m)
- Height 4.9ft (1.5m)
- Empty Weight 1,725lbs (782kg)
- Loaded Weight 2,019lbs (916kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.112
- Wing Loading 15.4lbs/ft2 (75.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 131.4ft2 (12.2m2)
- Drag Points 489
Parts
- Number of Parts 30
- Control Surfaces 4
- Performance Cost 106
- Log in to leave a comment
-
38.8k hypnotoadNice one. I have tried this kind of configuration, as I agree; there is something more more aesthetically pleasing with this setup, though you will always seem to get that slight wobble after a sharp pitch. Was wondering if positioning of VTOL nozzles may effect this and improve perhaps, on a different aircraft of course9.8 years ago
