This dude always has drama in the comments of these kinds of posts lmao

illustration nice

@bjac0 Let’s just leave it at that so the mods don’t remove the post due to conflicts, but just admire how good WCAC2 is at making art sometimes, and just how he can show us that ability. Btw, what’s up with the full interior version, @WritersCrusadersAirCo2?

@NTH ultimately WCAC decides what they draw, no one forced them to draw that and any true artist is subject to criticism. And the issue isn't just proportions its also the chosen pose and how they decided to shrink wrap the clothes of the one on the right. To be clear, the one on the left, I have little to no issue with, the one on the right is clearly drawn in a more explicit manor. I have nothing left to say on the matter. Juan previously stated they'd like the arguing to stop in this comment section, I don't think that statement was strictly limited to me and that other dude.

@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 mans I hope we get a figure of the two eventually

@bjac0 Dude, just an FYI, I’ve seen anime before(normally just at random) and I’ve taken note that the characters …ermm… “Features” Are sometimes exaggerated, even in E-rated and A-rated content, and clothing can be slightly explicit at times. WCAC2 was just making the characters just like in the anime as they are heavily influenced by it, so there’s not much to blame on him.

@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 Aaand you’ve totally destroyed my starvation for any sorta art from you. Good job and Happy early birthday!

goodness

@BaconEggs Erm actually, it’s perfectly legal under US law to create a SP account at ages under 13 IF it’s under direct parental supervision

@ThomasRoderick

"... and as for the upvote-download disparity, I'd say it's probably caused by Juan's build quality. He's most definitely better at drawing than he is at building, as signified by his reliance on other people's codes and parts - as well as a complete lack of interiors. So most people probably followed him for art and not for cars...."

---

Dang.. Guess I'm not a good builder then. Looks like I need to work on my DIA SunDale for a change..

@bjac0 @ThomasRoderick And please, enough with the arguments..

@ThomasRoderick I've fixed their names, you're welcome

@ThomasRoderick Simpleplanes is rated E for everyone, nowhere does it say that SP or the website is PG13, the closest thing to that you'd find is the rule against children under 13 making an account but that rule is 1, there for legal reasons due to COPPA. 2, is seldom actually enforced (i was 10 when I started playing sp, 11 when i made my account on sp, I've seen several other users tell mods directly that they are under 13 and then keep on using the website). And 3, the rule only prohibits making an account, not the usage of the website. And if we're gonna talk about rules, rule #1 on this website is "No sexually suggestive content". I'd argue quite heavily that the proportions chosen for these (and a few other drawings by WCAC) are not just for character building and that the poses are chosen to exaggerate said proportions. Its also an intentional decision to shrink-wrap her shirt and have her skirt tuck in towards her... you know what. I'm a fellow drawer of things and I have done female anatomy, these are all very intentional decisions you make in the artistic process. I don't really understand why you're bringing up Tinker Bell of all things as that has literally nothing to do with anything we're talking about. Technically a woman wearing a latex suit is fully clothed but good luck arguing to anyone that that is G-rated. The clothes are hardly the issue here although I will admit could be worse. Juan has drawn some pretty scantily clad women for the site before though...
.
Worth mentioning that this post still has about the same amount of upvotes as downloads which is unusual for most posts. Clearly something here is attracting people more than the build itself.
.
Im just gonna end this by saying that WCAC is clearly far from the worst offenders of my critiques, I felt like reaching out hoping that I would have a nice conversation about this stuff, creative to creative.
(Sorry bout the wall of text, this is a complicated subject and requires a complicated conversation)

@ThomasRoderick fyi pg-13 is "parents strongly cautioned" which I don't think any facet of the game itself or the website (according to the rules at least) go that far. child protection laws which prevent kids under 13 creating accounts do not equal the "pg13" movie rating in case you didn't know that

@ThomasRoderick Do not mischaracterize me or what I said. Im not shitting on WCAC's drawings or even their builds for that matter; I can tell care went into them, it's just not the right context. My arguement was simply that the drawings aren't just drawn for the plot if you catch my drift. I have no issue with the quality of WCAC's drawings or their builds, but the drawing just don't really add much to the build and I don't think its exactly appropriate for a website dedicated to a childrens game. And I think it's still evident that theres only 28 downloads compared to 24 upvotes, clearly the main attraction here is unfortunately not the build itself. If my original comments hadn't been deleted you would've seen that my arguement was much more fleshed out than "grr... anime".

Your drawings are so cute. Nice job adding them to the post.
Huh, I was not a reckless driver before, but who knows, one day I feel I need to be caught by those police officers. LOL

@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 @KSB24
and use the low parts version

@SuperSuperTheSylph If it does, use the Low Parts version

@KSB24 could you convert this into AI Police car?

His comment got removed.