The AX-400 features a huge gun that can decimate through the enemy armour. Using an 400mm EM Powered RailGun that can blast away 8000mm of steel, it is one tough giant! Now you may say that it can cause a huge recoil, but the gun is made of Graphene that can withstand extreme pressure from the Recoil, weighing at 1 ton. The rest of the weight is on the tank itself preventing flipovers. its layered with Carbyde at its hardspots, and Titanium on different crucial locations, The 4 TeslaCoils, from Eurasia, is used to decimate enemies at a high rate of fire! Equipped with a Variable dual Shovel. this can plow through enemy rubble left behind and any building too, 2 Front heavy turrets are there too! with 150 MM Each round, it consists of HCL, Krypton, Na, K, Configurable Cores too! It can be commanded by AI, RC or Crew, Throttle for acceleration, it can go fast, but thats not its sensible speed, it goes 40 MPH, 20K Foot Pounds of Torque, the engine is massive, Activate 2 Front turrets and Tesla guns with AG2, Main Turret with cannon elevation and rotation is AG3, AG1 fires 3 Missiles from the Turret, AG4 For the Ram, thanks to spefyjerbf for his Missiles!
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Successors 2 airplane(s)
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 28.4ft (8.6m)
- Length 70.2ft (21.4m)
- Height 27.3ft (8.3m)
- Empty Weight 60,948lbs (27,645kg)
- Loaded Weight 63,025lbs (28,588kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading 31.7lbs/ft2 (155.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,985.3ft2 (184.4m2)
- Drag Points 40314
Parts
- Number of Parts 366
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 1,225
Tag me on an unlisted plane, I need to say something.
@Pilotmario cool
We have a modified M3 Avenger for that. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@Pilotmario We don't. We have several vehicles for that
Your army still lacks the capability to tow disabled tanks off the battlefield or place a bridge somewhere. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@Pilotmario Just because I don't build much doesn't mean we're weak.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation We just tend to build different specialist vehicles off a common chassis because it's a lot simpler to do so.
After all, why go through the process of designing a completely new hull when you can modify something you have to be better.
Take the Avenger M3 main battle tank. While obsolete as a tank due to advances in firepower and armor, we have found new uses for the hull itself. The hull has been re-purposed into armored personnel carriers, self-propelled howitzers, self-propelled anti-aircraft guns, engineering tanks, and armored recovery vehicles.
This way, we can field a number of unique specialist vehicles while retaining a common chassis that allows for easier logistics.
Another common vehicle is the Ardent M6. While far from obsolete, it forms the majority of our tank force. As a result, it only makes sense to make specialist vehicles based off the chassis, such as self-propelled anti-aircraft guns, flame tanks, and command vehicles
We have self-propelled howitzers, armored personnel carriers, self-propelled anti-aircraft guns, assault guns, bridging vehicles (upcoming), engineering vehicles, armored recovery vehicles (basically tank tow trucks), mine-clearers, light reconnaissance tanks, main battle tanks, flame tanks, and command tanks.
How many different types of "tank" do you have? Main battle tank, super heavy tank, and now a light tank. Pitiful.
@Pilotmario Delete your comments as they're Cluttering my Comment section please.
My tanks are advanced, with Useful applications and several Models that your tanks lack, you're only repetitive, that's what you're good at
@Mudkip 404 error: logical argument not found.
@Pilotmario LOGIC B*TCH!
404 error: logical argument not found. @Mudkip
@Pilotmario You lie everyday.
Your tanks are an implication of such. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@DankDorito thanks fam!
@Pilotmario I never said they aren't? Lolwut
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation THE LAWS OF PHYSICS FROM 1944 ARE EQUALLY VALID A CENTURY AND A HALF LATER.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Nice tank!
@Pilotmario 3 seconds between each round and 360 Turret rotation
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation That's the same kind of gun, a 16 inch high velocity gun. Given your description, the gun here are more powerful guns than the Iowa-class battleship.
Now, for the huge recoil, you mentioned the thing is made of graphene, which is quite shock resistant. Technologies unavailable in 1944 could serve to reduce the recoil of the gun.
However, graphene is incredibly light, and therefore, I would presume, cause significant problems.
The most obvious solution is to employ additional or more effective dampeners, as well as limiting turret traverse in order to handle said recoil better.
However, this creates a whole host of other tactical problems, such as what happens when the enemy is anywhere but in front of the tank.
In addition, the gun would fire very slowly, at about a shot per minute, and would rely almost exclusively on an autoloader. In addition, given the immense size of 400mm projectiles, the ammunition capacity would be incredibly small, about a few rounds.
@Pilotmario i know about the Iowa Class Ships. but whats the relevance?
No, 16 inches.
Battleship guns.
Just for comparison, the most powerful battleship guns manufactured in America are the 16"/50 cal Mk 7 naval gun. 406mm weapons. Nine of these guns across three turrets, graced the American Iowa-class battleships, of which four were built.
I have personally visited one such battleship, the USS Missouri (BB-63). And these guns are HUGE.
50 calibers denotes barrel length, that is, the gun barrel is 50 times longer than the bore.
In terms of artillery, a 40+ caliber gun is considered a high-velocity gun.
Here is a link to the Iowa-class battleships I am talking about. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@Pilotmario Yes. its 15 INCHES
Do you realize just how big a 400mm gun is?
@Pilotmario RIP M5A5.
@exosuit @GoldenEagle