Profile image

[1:1] P-47 D Thunderbolt "Skinny Jean"

69.4k Chancey21  6.6 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Chancey21's P-47 D Thunderbolt

P-47 Thunderbolt

Lower Part Count Version

The Republic P-47 Thunderbolt was a World War II-era fighter aircraft produced by the United States from 1941 through 1945. Its primary armament was eight .50-caliber machine guns and in the fighter-bomber ground-attack role it could carry five-inch rockets or a bomb load of 2,500 pounds

IMPORTANT NOTE:

Despite the part count, this may run smoothly IDK why but it causes barely as much lag as a 900 should

Pilot Information:

User Manual:
VTOL= Flaps+Trim

Weapons Directory:

“Boom 25” (x2)
“.50 cal machine guns” (x8)

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor P-47 D Thunderbolt
  • Successors 2 airplane(s) +21 bonus
  • Created On Mac
  • Wingspan 41.3ft (12.6m)
  • Length 37.6ft (11.5m)
  • Height 18.8ft (5.7m)
  • Empty Weight 31,669lbs (14,365kg)
  • Loaded Weight 43,377lbs (19,675kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.38
  • Wing Loading 11.6lbs/ft2 (56.7kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 3,735.7ft2 (347.1m2)
  • Drag Points 11563

Parts

  • Number of Parts 915
  • Control Surfaces 12
  • Performance Cost 2,910
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    8,916 SakuraSaku

    such a great cockpit interior
    love it

    5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Chancey21 My bad I see the wire going to the back Nice Plane

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    Look it up, mine is realistic @sailor98

    +1 6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    You need to put a full canopy on it. The "JUG" is a fighter not a trainer aircraft.

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Oh fuk yea... lets go make some fokkerwolves @Chancey21

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    I’m making a Fokker Dr.1 right now @PekengDuck

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Someone finally made a P47 thunderbolt in SP.... can u make a hitlerbolt next?

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,142 Hypn0

    @DarthAbhinav what kind is it?

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    Thank you, it took twice as long as the actual plane @JangoTheMango

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    It’s already out boi read the desc @kukimuki1234

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.3k kukimuki1234

    When you make a lower ammount of parts version,you could make those tiles on nose bigger.

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    Oh gosh, mine can build up to 3000 and run 7000 @DarthAbhinav

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    Thanks for my first feature! @weebabyseamus

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    There is a lower pt cnt link in the desc @Kazin @DarthAbhinav

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,873 Kazin

    @Chancey21 lol, I think some people want a mobile friendly version XD

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    incredibly amazing.

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    I like how so much of the part count went into the checkered pattern. Nice plane BTW!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    I have one @TheEggman

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    456 TheEggman

    I love this build, a lower part count would be nice. Good job!

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    Thanks for the spotlight @BaconAircraft

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.4k Chancey21

    I am planning on them on my Antoinette and Fokker Dr1 @BaconAircraft

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    You should give realistic aerofoils a shot. They will add so much more realism to your already excellent build.

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    35.1k AdlerSteiner

    Hell yeah! Not like my wurger XD@Chancey21

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Nice prop

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    For starters they fatten as they go towards the wing tip. And their supposed to be very curved, yours are kinda blocky and have a lot of sharp angles @Chancey21

    6.6 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments